TY - JOUR
T1 - A call to action
T2 - Taking the untenable out of women professors' pregnancy, postpartum, and caregiving demands
AU - Gabriel, Allison S.
AU - Allen, Tammy D.
AU - Devers, Cynthia E.
AU - Eby, Lillian T.
AU - Gilson, Lucy L.
AU - Hebl, Mikki
AU - Kehoe, Rebecca R.
AU - King, Eden B.
AU - Ladge, Jamie J.
AU - Little, Laura M.
AU - Ou, Amy Yi
AU - Schleicher, Deidra J.
AU - Shockley, Kristen M.
AU - Klotz, Anthony C.
AU - Rosen, Christopher C.
N1 - Funding Information: Importantly, the financial case is not just about ensuring that women produce a certain number of publications. Rather, women bring a great deal to the table in the development of impactful social science. As argued by Formanowicz (), “[u]nderrepresentation of women in academia… is not only a matter of equality but it also influences the quality of science” (p. 2, italics in original). Moreover, having diverse gender representation within departments and research teams helps foster novel ideas (see research on the diversity–innovation paradox; Hofstra et al., ). Thus, our science is enhanced when women are able to participate in departments in a way that best serves them and their caregiving needs. This should matter to universities insomuch as high-quality research from their faculty enhances prestige and increases the likelihood of obtaining external grants, benefitting universities in the form of indirect costs. Such research prestige and grant funding directly impact the university’s financial health (Shifrin & Tucker, ). When lack of support for caregivers inhibits women from fully engaging at work, advancing in their fields, or causes them to exit, these benefits are clearly undermined. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
PY - 2023/6/9
Y1 - 2023/6/9
N2 - Despite becoming increasingly represented in academic departments, women scholars face a critical lack of support as they navigate demands pertaining to pregnancy, motherhood, and child caregiving. In addition, cultural norms surrounding how faculty and academic leaders discuss and talk about tenure, promotion, and career success have created pressure for women who wish to grow their family and care for their children, leading to questions about whether it is possible for these women to have a family and an academic career. This paper is a call to action for academia to build structures that support professors who are women as they navigate the complexities of pregnancy, the postpartum period, and the caregiving demands of their children. We specifically call on those of us in I-O psychology, management, and related departments to lead the way. In making this call, we first present the realistic, moral, and financial cases for why this issue needs to be at the forefront of discussions surrounding success in the academy. We then discuss how, in the U.S. and elsewhere, an absence of policies supporting women places two groups of academics - department heads (as the leaders of departments who have discretion outside of formal policies to make work better for women) and other faculty members (as potential allies both in the department and within our professional organizations) - in a critical position to enact support and change. We conclude with our boldest call - to make a cultural shift that shatters the assumption that having a family is not compatible with academic success. Combined, we seek to launch a discussion that leads directly to necessary and overdue changes in how women scholars are supported in academia.
AB - Despite becoming increasingly represented in academic departments, women scholars face a critical lack of support as they navigate demands pertaining to pregnancy, motherhood, and child caregiving. In addition, cultural norms surrounding how faculty and academic leaders discuss and talk about tenure, promotion, and career success have created pressure for women who wish to grow their family and care for their children, leading to questions about whether it is possible for these women to have a family and an academic career. This paper is a call to action for academia to build structures that support professors who are women as they navigate the complexities of pregnancy, the postpartum period, and the caregiving demands of their children. We specifically call on those of us in I-O psychology, management, and related departments to lead the way. In making this call, we first present the realistic, moral, and financial cases for why this issue needs to be at the forefront of discussions surrounding success in the academy. We then discuss how, in the U.S. and elsewhere, an absence of policies supporting women places two groups of academics - department heads (as the leaders of departments who have discretion outside of formal policies to make work better for women) and other faculty members (as potential allies both in the department and within our professional organizations) - in a critical position to enact support and change. We conclude with our boldest call - to make a cultural shift that shatters the assumption that having a family is not compatible with academic success. Combined, we seek to launch a discussion that leads directly to necessary and overdue changes in how women scholars are supported in academia.
KW - caregiving
KW - gender issues in academia
KW - motherhood
KW - work-family support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161289506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85161289506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/iop.2022.111
DO - 10.1017/iop.2022.111
M3 - Article
SN - 1754-9426
VL - 16
SP - 187
EP - 210
JO - Industrial and Organizational Psychology
JF - Industrial and Organizational Psychology
IS - 2
ER -