TY - JOUR
T1 - A Dependence of the Tidal Disruption Event Rate on Global Stellar Surface Mass Density and Stellar Velocity Dispersion
AU - Graur, Or
AU - French, K. Decker
AU - Zahid, H. Jabran
AU - Guillochon, James
AU - Mandel, Kaisey S.
AU - Auchettl, Katie
AU - Zabludoff, Ann I.
N1 - Funding Information: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS website ishttp://www.sdss.org/. Funding Information: O.G. is supported by an NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Fellowship under award AST-1602595. K.D.F. is supported by Hubble Fellowship Grant HST-HF2-51391.001-A, provided by NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555. K.S.M. was supported at Harvard by NSF grants AST-1211196 and AST-1516854. A.I.Z. acknowledges funding from NSF grant AST-0908280 and NASA grant ADP-NNX10AE88G. Funding Information: Funding for SDSS-III has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS-III website ishttp://www.sdss3.org/. Publisher Copyright: © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1/20
Y1 - 2018/1/20
N2 - The rate of tidal disruption events (TDEs), RTDE, is predicted to depend on stellar conditions near the super-massive black hole (SMBH), which are on difficult-to-measure sub-parsec scales. We test whether RTDE depends on kpcscale global galaxy properties, which are observable. We concentrate on stellar surface mass density, ∑M∗ , and velocity dispersion, σv, which correlate with the stellar density and velocity dispersion of the stars around the SMBH. We consider 35 TDE candidates, with and without known X-ray emission. The hosts range from starforming to quiescent to quiescent with strong Balmer absorption lines. The last (often with post-starburst spectra) are overrepresented in our sample by a factor of 35+21-17 or 18+8-7, depending on the strength of the Hδ absorption line. For a subsample of hosts with homogeneous measurements, ∑M∗ = 109-1010 M⊙/kpc2, higher on average than for a volume-weighted control sample of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies with similar redshifts and stellar masses. This is because (1) most of the TDE hosts here are quiescent galaxies, which tend to have higher ∑M∗ than the star-forming galaxies that dominate the control, and (2) the star-forming hosts have higher average ∑M∗ than the star-forming control. There is also a weak suggestion that TDE hosts have lower σv than for the quiescent control. Assuming that RTDE∝ ∑M∗α × σvβ, and applying a statistical model to the TDE hosts and control sample, we estimate α = 0.9 ; 0.2 and β = -1.0 0.6. This is broadly consistent with RTDE being tied to the dynamical relaxation of stars surrounding the SMBH.
AB - The rate of tidal disruption events (TDEs), RTDE, is predicted to depend on stellar conditions near the super-massive black hole (SMBH), which are on difficult-to-measure sub-parsec scales. We test whether RTDE depends on kpcscale global galaxy properties, which are observable. We concentrate on stellar surface mass density, ∑M∗ , and velocity dispersion, σv, which correlate with the stellar density and velocity dispersion of the stars around the SMBH. We consider 35 TDE candidates, with and without known X-ray emission. The hosts range from starforming to quiescent to quiescent with strong Balmer absorption lines. The last (often with post-starburst spectra) are overrepresented in our sample by a factor of 35+21-17 or 18+8-7, depending on the strength of the Hδ absorption line. For a subsample of hosts with homogeneous measurements, ∑M∗ = 109-1010 M⊙/kpc2, higher on average than for a volume-weighted control sample of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies with similar redshifts and stellar masses. This is because (1) most of the TDE hosts here are quiescent galaxies, which tend to have higher ∑M∗ than the star-forming galaxies that dominate the control, and (2) the star-forming hosts have higher average ∑M∗ than the star-forming control. There is also a weak suggestion that TDE hosts have lower σv than for the quiescent control. Assuming that RTDE∝ ∑M∗α × σvβ, and applying a statistical model to the TDE hosts and control sample, we estimate α = 0.9 ; 0.2 and β = -1.0 0.6. This is broadly consistent with RTDE being tied to the dynamical relaxation of stars surrounding the SMBH.
KW - black hole physics
KW - galaxies: evolution
KW - galaxies: nuclei
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041127856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041127856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3fd
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3fd
M3 - Article
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 853
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 39
ER -