TY - JOUR
T1 - A framework for addressing racial and related inequities in conservation
AU - Mbizah, Moreangels M.
AU - Allen, Tanesha
AU - Allred, Shorna
AU - Bright Ross, Julius G.
AU - Dávalos, Andrea
AU - Dickman, Amy
AU - Dunaway, Michael
AU - Ghosh, Ritwick
AU - Gomera, Maxwell
AU - Hammond, Niall L.
AU - Hare, Darragh
AU - Kepe, Thembela
AU - Nkomo, Merlyn Nomusa
AU - Oommen, Meera Anna
AU - Paudel, Kumar
AU - Perram, Anouska
AU - Roe, Dilys
AU - Rudd, Lauren F.
AU - Shanker, Kartik
AU - Thekaekara, Tarsh
AU - Biggs, Duan
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Springer Nature Limited 2026.
PY - 2026/1/8
Y1 - 2026/1/8
N2 - In 2020, a global surge of activism linked to the Black Lives Matter movement prompted scientists to stage an academic ‘strike’, drawing attention to the ethical responsibility of addressing systemic racism. This catalysed debate in conservation, adding urgency to decades of scholarship on marginalization. In this Perspective, we review this literature and examine how exclusion in conservation persists across intersections of race, class, urban–rural divides, nationality and power dynamics from local to global levels. We highlight how marginalization and ‘othering’ disproportionately affect Black, Indigenous and people of colour (BIPOC) communities, especially in the Global South. Expansion of protected areas and the prioritization of individual animal lives over human well-being can intensify such inequities. We propose a framework for more inclusive conservation: recognizing and supporting human rights, ensuring local community agency, challenging entrenched norms in BIPOC engagement, and fostering educational opportunities led by and for BIPOC communities. Amid shifting global politics, including reduced US federal support for social and conservation issues, this framework provides guidance to counter racism and exclusion. By rethinking conservation practice, it seeks to build long-lasting, equitable and inclusive approaches that respect both people and nature.
AB - In 2020, a global surge of activism linked to the Black Lives Matter movement prompted scientists to stage an academic ‘strike’, drawing attention to the ethical responsibility of addressing systemic racism. This catalysed debate in conservation, adding urgency to decades of scholarship on marginalization. In this Perspective, we review this literature and examine how exclusion in conservation persists across intersections of race, class, urban–rural divides, nationality and power dynamics from local to global levels. We highlight how marginalization and ‘othering’ disproportionately affect Black, Indigenous and people of colour (BIPOC) communities, especially in the Global South. Expansion of protected areas and the prioritization of individual animal lives over human well-being can intensify such inequities. We propose a framework for more inclusive conservation: recognizing and supporting human rights, ensuring local community agency, challenging entrenched norms in BIPOC engagement, and fostering educational opportunities led by and for BIPOC communities. Amid shifting global politics, including reduced US federal support for social and conservation issues, this framework provides guidance to counter racism and exclusion. By rethinking conservation practice, it seeks to build long-lasting, equitable and inclusive approaches that respect both people and nature.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026934701
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026934701#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-025-09892-1
DO - 10.1038/s41586-025-09892-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 41501199
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 649
SP - 301
EP - 309
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 8096
ER -