TY - JOUR
T1 - A Re–Imagining of Evaluation as Social Justice
T2 - A Discussion of the Education Justice Project
AU - Boyce, Ayesha
N1 - Funding Information: The Education Justice Project, specifically director Dr. Rebecca Ginsburg and volunteer evaluators Dr. Jennifer Greene and Dr. Nora Gannon–Slater, for their commitment to social justice, and whose work has inspired so many. Dr. Jill Anne Chouinard, for her conceptualization of a restorative justice approach to evaluation which inspired my reflection that led to this article and for feedback on early drafts of this paper. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Institute for Critical Education Studies.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - While efforts to increase access to higher education for incarcerated populations are laudable, the prominent discourse, rationale, and examined outcomes are narrowly defined. Too often program evaluations, especially those within criminal justice contexts, implicitly prescribe values and condone oppressive policies, while claiming neutrality through methodology. What is needed are evaluation frameworks and theories born in opposition to the current ‘gold standard’, which currently fails to consider conditions linked to the many structural inequities of society, and misses the opportunity to advocate for social justice. This paper presents a restorative justice approach to evaluation, conceptualized to address the complex socio-political and cultural dynamics of educational programs within prisons, and as way to bring stakeholders together to generate new meaning and understanding. Vignettes are utilized to illustrate what a restorative justice approach to evaluation might look like within the case example of the Education Justice Project, a higher education program within prison.
AB - While efforts to increase access to higher education for incarcerated populations are laudable, the prominent discourse, rationale, and examined outcomes are narrowly defined. Too often program evaluations, especially those within criminal justice contexts, implicitly prescribe values and condone oppressive policies, while claiming neutrality through methodology. What is needed are evaluation frameworks and theories born in opposition to the current ‘gold standard’, which currently fails to consider conditions linked to the many structural inequities of society, and misses the opportunity to advocate for social justice. This paper presents a restorative justice approach to evaluation, conceptualized to address the complex socio-political and cultural dynamics of educational programs within prisons, and as way to bring stakeholders together to generate new meaning and understanding. Vignettes are utilized to illustrate what a restorative justice approach to evaluation might look like within the case example of the Education Justice Project, a higher education program within prison.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109385424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109385424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14288/ce.v10i1.186323
DO - 10.14288/ce.v10i1.186323
M3 - Article
SN - 1920-4175
VL - 10
JO - Critical Education
JF - Critical Education
IS - 1
ER -