TY - JOUR
T1 - A Survey on FEC Codes for 100 G and beyond Optical Networks
AU - Tzimpragos, Georgios
AU - Kachris, Christoforos
AU - Djordjevic, Ivan B.
AU - Cvijetic, Milorad
AU - Soudris, Dimitrios
AU - Tomkos, Ioannis
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014 IEEE.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Due to the rapid increase in network traffic in the last few years, many telecommunication operators have started transitions to 100-Gb/s optical networks and beyond. However, high-speed optical networks need more efficient forward error correction (FEC) codes to deal with optical impairments, such as uncompensated chromatic dispersion, polarization mode dispersion, and nonlinear effects, and keep the bit error rate (BER) at long distances sufficiently low. To address these issues, new FEC codes, called third-generation codes, have been proposed. A majority of these codes are based on soft-decision decoders and can provide higher coding gain as compared with their predecessors. This paper presents a thorough survey of third-generation FEC codes, suitable for 100 G and beyond optical networks. Furthermore, this paper discusses the main advantages and drawbacks of each scheme and provides a qualitative categorization and comparison of the proposed schemes based on their main features, such as net coding gain and BER. Information about the complexity of each scheme is given as well.
AB - Due to the rapid increase in network traffic in the last few years, many telecommunication operators have started transitions to 100-Gb/s optical networks and beyond. However, high-speed optical networks need more efficient forward error correction (FEC) codes to deal with optical impairments, such as uncompensated chromatic dispersion, polarization mode dispersion, and nonlinear effects, and keep the bit error rate (BER) at long distances sufficiently low. To address these issues, new FEC codes, called third-generation codes, have been proposed. A majority of these codes are based on soft-decision decoders and can provide higher coding gain as compared with their predecessors. This paper presents a thorough survey of third-generation FEC codes, suitable for 100 G and beyond optical networks. Furthermore, this paper discusses the main advantages and drawbacks of each scheme and provides a qualitative categorization and comparison of the proposed schemes based on their main features, such as net coding gain and BER. Information about the complexity of each scheme is given as well.
KW - 100 G
KW - 3rd generation
KW - Error control coding (ECC)
KW - forward error correction (FEC)
KW - optical networks
KW - survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962166005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962166005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/COMST.2014.2361754
DO - 10.1109/COMST.2014.2361754
M3 - Review article
SN - 1553-877X
VL - 18
SP - 209
EP - 221
JO - IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
JF - IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
IS - 1
M1 - 6917198
ER -