TY - JOUR
T1 - Anion exchange resin removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from impacted water
T2 - A critical review
AU - Boyer, Treavor H.
AU - Fang, Yida
AU - Ellis, Anderson
AU - Dietz, Rebecca
AU - Choi, Youn Jeong
AU - Schaefer, Charles E.
AU - Higgins, Christopher P.
AU - Strathmann, Timothy J.
N1 - Funding Information: This effort was supported by SERDP grant ER18-1063 Regenerable Resin Sorbent Technologies with Regenerant Solution Recycling for Sustainable Treatment of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs). We thank Christian Kassar for assistance with preparing tables. This paper was improved by the thoughtful and detailed comments of three anonymous reviewers. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/7/15
Y1 - 2021/7/15
N2 - A key gap in the literature on the treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in impacted water is the absence of a review article dedicated to anion exchange resin (AER) treatment. This gap is important because previous research has consistently shown adsorption by AER to be one of the most effective treatment processes for PFAS removal from impacted water, and AER is one of the most commonly deployed technologies in the field. Given the scope of the previous review articles on PFAS removal by various adsorbent types, the sections on AER do not explore the full depth of PFAS and AER interactions nor cover the breadth of AER testing conditions. Accordingly, the goal of this paper was to critically review the available peer-reviewed literature on PFAS removal from water by AER. The specific objectives of the review were to synthesize the previous literature results on (1) batch adsorption behavior, (2) impact of water chemistry conditions, (3) continuous-flow adsorption, (4) adsorption modeling, (5) regeneration, and (6) weak-base AER. Following from critical review of the literature, the future research priorities discussed include: (i) improving the underlying science that governs PFAS–resin interactions, (ii) improving methods for resin regeneration and management of PFAS-contaminated concentrate streams, and (iii) comparative life cycle environmental and economic analyses for ion exchange treatment systems relative to competing technologies.
AB - A key gap in the literature on the treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in impacted water is the absence of a review article dedicated to anion exchange resin (AER) treatment. This gap is important because previous research has consistently shown adsorption by AER to be one of the most effective treatment processes for PFAS removal from impacted water, and AER is one of the most commonly deployed technologies in the field. Given the scope of the previous review articles on PFAS removal by various adsorbent types, the sections on AER do not explore the full depth of PFAS and AER interactions nor cover the breadth of AER testing conditions. Accordingly, the goal of this paper was to critically review the available peer-reviewed literature on PFAS removal from water by AER. The specific objectives of the review were to synthesize the previous literature results on (1) batch adsorption behavior, (2) impact of water chemistry conditions, (3) continuous-flow adsorption, (4) adsorption modeling, (5) regeneration, and (6) weak-base AER. Following from critical review of the literature, the future research priorities discussed include: (i) improving the underlying science that governs PFAS–resin interactions, (ii) improving methods for resin regeneration and management of PFAS-contaminated concentrate streams, and (iii) comparative life cycle environmental and economic analyses for ion exchange treatment systems relative to competing technologies.
KW - Natural organic matter
KW - Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)
KW - Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
KW - Polyacrylic resin
KW - Polystyrene resin
KW - Regeneration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109115686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109115686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117244
DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117244
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34089925
SN - 0043-1354
VL - 200
JO - Water Research
JF - Water Research
M1 - 117244
ER -