TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of alternative draw solutions for optimized performance of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine
AU - Hickenbottom, Kerri L.
AU - Vanneste, Johan
AU - Cath, Tzahi Y.
N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank US Department of Energy, Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-e) Award # 0670-3228 and EPA-STAR Award # FP91746401-0 for the financial support of the research. The authors would also like to acknowledge Mr. Tani Cath and Mr. Mike Veres for their technical support in bench scale system fabrication and the control system design, and Ms. Katie Schumacher and Mr. Curtis Weller for their contributions in the lab. Special thanks to Keith Lampi and Edward Beaudry (HTI) for providing membranes and technical support. Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/4/15
Y1 - 2016/4/15
N2 - Osmotic power harnesses the energy of mixing between high and low salinity streams. The osmotic heat engine (OHE) is a closed-loop, membrane-based power generation cycle that couples pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), an osmotically driven membrane process, with a thermal separation process. In this investigation, membrane distillation (MD), a thermally driven membrane process, was used. High power density in PRO is essential to minimize equipment costs and parasitic pumping losses. Likewise, high water flux is needed in MD to efficiently reconcentrate the diluted draw solution from the PRO process and minimize equipment costs. In this study, several ionic organic and inorganic draw solutions were evaluated as working fluids in the OHE. Their performance was assessed in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and MD water flux and thermal efficiency. Potential pore wetting of the MD membrane was also evaluated. The working fluids were also assessed in terms of their potential for equipment corrosion. Results indicate that sodium formate and CaCl2 outperform NaCl (commonly used PRO draw solution) in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and that LiCl and CaCl2 outperform NaCl in terms of MD water flux. Furthermore, there were no signs of MD membrane wetting, even at high feed concentrations. Results were used to perform an economic analysis and make future recommendations on the most suitable working fluid for the OHE. Of the select salts, CaCl2, MgCl2, sodium propionate, and LiCl resulted in the lowest OHE electricity generation costs and had the lowest potential for corrosion.
AB - Osmotic power harnesses the energy of mixing between high and low salinity streams. The osmotic heat engine (OHE) is a closed-loop, membrane-based power generation cycle that couples pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), an osmotically driven membrane process, with a thermal separation process. In this investigation, membrane distillation (MD), a thermally driven membrane process, was used. High power density in PRO is essential to minimize equipment costs and parasitic pumping losses. Likewise, high water flux is needed in MD to efficiently reconcentrate the diluted draw solution from the PRO process and minimize equipment costs. In this study, several ionic organic and inorganic draw solutions were evaluated as working fluids in the OHE. Their performance was assessed in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and MD water flux and thermal efficiency. Potential pore wetting of the MD membrane was also evaluated. The working fluids were also assessed in terms of their potential for equipment corrosion. Results indicate that sodium formate and CaCl2 outperform NaCl (commonly used PRO draw solution) in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and that LiCl and CaCl2 outperform NaCl in terms of MD water flux. Furthermore, there were no signs of MD membrane wetting, even at high feed concentrations. Results were used to perform an economic analysis and make future recommendations on the most suitable working fluid for the OHE. Of the select salts, CaCl2, MgCl2, sodium propionate, and LiCl resulted in the lowest OHE electricity generation costs and had the lowest potential for corrosion.
KW - Draw solutions
KW - Energy-water nexus
KW - Membrane distillation
KW - Osmotic power
KW - Pressure retarded osmosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955512943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955512943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0376-7388
VL - 504
SP - 162
EP - 175
JO - Journal of Membrane Science
JF - Journal of Membrane Science
ER -