TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone Mineral Content Distribution in Response to Long-term Training of Elite Rowers
AU - Mourtakos, Stamatis
AU - Kavouras, Stavros
AU - Vasiliou, Stathis
AU - Soultanakis, Helen
AU - Bardis, Costas
AU - Sidossis, Labros
AU - Tenta, Roxane
N1 - Funding Information: The Authors would also like extend their gratitude to the athletes of the Hellenic National Rowing members, the coach Mr. Gianni Postiliogne, and the medical doctor Mr. Giannis Christogiannis for their valuable help and support throughout this research investigation. This study was supported by the Postgraduate Program “Applied Nutrition and Dietetics”, Harokopio University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background/Aim: Bone response to exercise depends on the type and size of the mechanical stimulus. In rowing, athletes are exposed to low mechanical but large compression loads mainly on the trunk. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of rowing on total and regional bone quality and bone turnover parameters in elite rowing athletes vs. control subjects. Materials and Methods: Twenty world-class rowers and twenty active, but not athletic, men participated in the study. Bone mineral density (BMD) and body mineral content (BMC) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone turnover markers (OPG and RANKL) in serum were assessed by Elisa method. Results: The current research revealed no statistical difference in total bone mineral density (TBMD) and total body mineral content (TBMC) between elite-level rowers and control subjects. Nevertheless, Trunk BMC (p=0.02) and Trunk BMC/TBMC ratio (p=0.01) were significantly higher in rowers than those in the control group. In contrast, in the control group, the Lower limbs BMC/TBMC ratio (p=0.007) was statistically higher. Furthermore, RANKL (p=0.011) and OPG (p=0.03) were statistically significantly higher in rowers, whereas the OPG/RANKL ratio (p=0.012) was statistically higher in the control group. Conclusion: Rowing, as a non-weight-bearing exercise, did not alter total bone density but induced a remarkable redistribution of bone density from the lower limbs to the trunk. In addition, the current evidence suggests that the underlying molecular mechanism is based on turnover of intermediates, rather than solely bone redistribution.
AB - Background/Aim: Bone response to exercise depends on the type and size of the mechanical stimulus. In rowing, athletes are exposed to low mechanical but large compression loads mainly on the trunk. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of rowing on total and regional bone quality and bone turnover parameters in elite rowing athletes vs. control subjects. Materials and Methods: Twenty world-class rowers and twenty active, but not athletic, men participated in the study. Bone mineral density (BMD) and body mineral content (BMC) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone turnover markers (OPG and RANKL) in serum were assessed by Elisa method. Results: The current research revealed no statistical difference in total bone mineral density (TBMD) and total body mineral content (TBMC) between elite-level rowers and control subjects. Nevertheless, Trunk BMC (p=0.02) and Trunk BMC/TBMC ratio (p=0.01) were significantly higher in rowers than those in the control group. In contrast, in the control group, the Lower limbs BMC/TBMC ratio (p=0.007) was statistically higher. Furthermore, RANKL (p=0.011) and OPG (p=0.03) were statistically significantly higher in rowers, whereas the OPG/RANKL ratio (p=0.012) was statistically higher in the control group. Conclusion: Rowing, as a non-weight-bearing exercise, did not alter total bone density but induced a remarkable redistribution of bone density from the lower limbs to the trunk. In addition, the current evidence suggests that the underlying molecular mechanism is based on turnover of intermediates, rather than solely bone redistribution.
KW - OPG
KW - RANKL
KW - Rowing
KW - bone mineral content
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149490219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149490219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21873/invivo.13119
DO - 10.21873/invivo.13119
M3 - Article
C2 - 36881058
SN - 0258-851X
VL - 37
SP - 611
EP - 617
JO - In Vivo
JF - In Vivo
IS - 2
ER -