TY - JOUR
T1 - Cancer survivors’ greatest challenges of living with an ostomy
T2 - findings from the Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) randomized trial
AU - Grant, Marcia
AU - Sun, Virginia
AU - Tallman, Nancy J.
AU - Wendel, Christopher S.
AU - McCorkle, Ruth
AU - Ercolano, Elizabeth
AU - Simons, Christie
AU - Mo, Julia
AU - Raza, Sabreen
AU - Donahue, Deborah
AU - Passero, Frank
AU - Henson, Joshua
AU - MacDougall, Lyn
AU - Friedlaender, Jonathan
AU - Pitcher, Pamela
AU - Fry, Dan
AU - Yonsetto, Pete
AU - Holcomb, Michael J.
AU - Hornbrook, Mark C.
AU - Weinstein, Ronald S.
AU - Krouse, Robert S.
N1 - Funding Information: Research reported in this publication was supported through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®) Program Award (CDR 1507–31690). Funding for this research has been provided in part by The Benjamin & Mary Siddons Measey Foundation (Miss Mo). Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Objectives: An ostomy results in lifelong quality of life changes for a cancer survivor. We describe the greatest challenges reported from a randomized trial of cancer survivors with stomas (ostomies). Methods: Cancer survivors with ostomies participating in a multi-site randomized prospective trial of an Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) program versus usual care (UC) were surveyed at six months post accrual. An open-ended question requested greatest challenges after ostomy surgery. Quantitative descriptive and qualitative analyses were used to examine greatest challenges reported. Results: A total of 118 trial participants identified greatest challenges with 55 in the OSMT and 63 in the UC. Six conceptual domains were used to code comments—physical, psychological, social, and spiritual quality of life; ostomy-specific issues, and healthcare issues. The OSMT contributed 187 comments, and UC contributed 235 comments. Ostomy specific issues and social well-being had the most comments overall with UC contributing more comments in all domains except physical well-being. Word Clouds revealed post-operative and treatment-related issues and going out in public as the most common challenges in both groups. Word Clouds compared types of ostomies revealing bowel function challenges (colostomy group), difficulties going out in public (ileostomy group), and positive support (urostomy group). Conclusions: Fewer challenges submitted by the OSMT group provide the beginning evidence of the OSMT program impact. Dominant challenges across both groups were social well-being and ostomy care. Challenges varied by type of ostomy. Findings support long-term care and support for all cancer survivors with ostomies.
AB - Objectives: An ostomy results in lifelong quality of life changes for a cancer survivor. We describe the greatest challenges reported from a randomized trial of cancer survivors with stomas (ostomies). Methods: Cancer survivors with ostomies participating in a multi-site randomized prospective trial of an Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) program versus usual care (UC) were surveyed at six months post accrual. An open-ended question requested greatest challenges after ostomy surgery. Quantitative descriptive and qualitative analyses were used to examine greatest challenges reported. Results: A total of 118 trial participants identified greatest challenges with 55 in the OSMT and 63 in the UC. Six conceptual domains were used to code comments—physical, psychological, social, and spiritual quality of life; ostomy-specific issues, and healthcare issues. The OSMT contributed 187 comments, and UC contributed 235 comments. Ostomy specific issues and social well-being had the most comments overall with UC contributing more comments in all domains except physical well-being. Word Clouds revealed post-operative and treatment-related issues and going out in public as the most common challenges in both groups. Word Clouds compared types of ostomies revealing bowel function challenges (colostomy group), difficulties going out in public (ileostomy group), and positive support (urostomy group). Conclusions: Fewer challenges submitted by the OSMT group provide the beginning evidence of the OSMT program impact. Dominant challenges across both groups were social well-being and ostomy care. Challenges varied by type of ostomy. Findings support long-term care and support for all cancer survivors with ostomies.
KW - Cancer survivors
KW - Challenges
KW - Ostomies
KW - Telehealth support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113402864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113402864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06449-6
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06449-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 34435212
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 30
SP - 1139
EP - 1147
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 2
ER -