Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Choosing the appropriate statistics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

The contrast-based (CB) method for network Meta-analysis (NMA) on binary outcomes typically focuses on the relative treatment effects and is incapable to estimate the overall treatment-specific event rates. There have been a lot of papers reporting only odds ratios (ORs) based on the CB method. However, there is doubt about the appropriateness of merely reporting this summary statistic. In this chapter, we present a recently proposed arm-based (AB) method developed from a missing data perspective and illustrate how treatment-specific event proportions, risk differences (RDs), risk ratios (RRs), and ORs can be computed in NMAs. This more comprehensive and appropriate reporting of summary statistics facilitates patients and their caregivers to understand and trade-off efficacy and safety and thus the AB approach is recommended in practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNetwork Meta-Analysis
Subtitle of host publicationEvidence Synthesis with Mixed Treatment Comparison
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages141-153
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781633210042
ISBN (Print)9781633210011
StatePublished - Jul 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Appropriate statistics
  • arm-based method
  • contrast-based method
  • odds ratio
  • population-averaged event rate
  • relative risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing the appropriate statistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this