Abstract
This article examines constructions of Roman citizenship in Roman state art, arguing that beginning in the late republic a broader concept of citizenship was prevalent—one rooted largely in shared culture and defined in opposition to a “barbarian” other. From this reading of state art, two arguments emerge: First, the emphasis on enculturation created an ever-moving line between Roman and barbarian. Second, the subject position created subjected both the Roman viewer and non-Roman subject. The article then turns to a reading of Greek orator Aristides’s Regarding Rome to show that the concept of citizenship stressed in state art is clearly present, though not necessarily well received.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 147-161 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Advances in the History of Rhetoric |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Communication
- Linguistics and Language
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Citizens and captives: Depictions of the “conquered” in the Roman Empire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS