Civility and the bounds of the permissible: Scholars of color embodying the very social-political dynamics at the heart of their critiques

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on Steven Salaita’s tweets from the summer of 2014 to illustrate how civility becomes deployed in a larger struggle to control scholars of color seeking to bring clarity to, and shed light on, the various material and intellectual complicities informing the US-Israel-Palestinian conflict. It also focuses on what happened to Salaita with the self-promoting exercises of Jason Hill, which represent a predictable but nonetheless harmful form of political and intellectual opportunism. Expressing anger at the killing and maiming of Palestinians in Gaza by Israeli munitions is, by definition, uncivilized - and for some - anti-Semitic because to recognize Palestinian pain and loss is to condemn Israel’s role in producing that pain and loss. To have given Salaita a place among the faculty at Illinois would be to grant the Palestinians, what the late Edward Said called, “the permission to narrate” - which supposedly represents an existential threat to Israel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCivility, Free Speech, and Academic Freedom in Higher Education
Subtitle of host publicationFaculty on the Margins
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages111-131
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781000389470
ISBN (Print)9780367243647
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Civility and the bounds of the permissible: Scholars of color embodying the very social-political dynamics at the heart of their critiques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this