TY - JOUR
T1 - Common terminology and acoustic measures for human voice and birdsong
AU - Badwal, Areen
AU - Poertner, Johanna
AU - Samlan, Robin A.
AU - Miller, Julie E.
N1 - Funding Information: Data collection was supported by University of Arizona startup funds to Julie E. Miller and financial support to Areen Badwal from the University of Arizona Undergraduate Biological Research Program. We would like to thank Stephanie Munger (University of Arizona) for the birdsong collection, Nancy Day (University of California, Los Angeles) for the MATLAB code, and University of Arizona Animal Care. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Purpose: The zebra finch is used as a model to study the neural circuitry of auditory-guided human vocal production. The terminology of birdsong production and acoustic analysis, however, differs from human voice production, making it difficult for voice researchers of either species to navigate the literature from the other. The purpose of this research note is to identify common terminology and measures to better compare information across species. Method: Terminology used in the birdsong literature will be mapped onto terminology used in the human voice production literature. Measures typically used to quantify the percepts of pitch, loudness, and quality will be described. Measures common to the literature in both species will be made from the songs of 3 middle-age birds using Praat and Song Analysis Pro. Two measures, cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and Wiener entropy (WE), will be compared to determine if they provide similar information. Results: Similarities and differences in terminology and acoustic analyses are presented. A core set of measures including frequency, frequency variability within a syllable, intensity, CPP, and WE are proposed for future studies. CPP and WE are related yet provide unique information about the syllable structure. Conclusions: Using a core set of measures familiar to both human voice and birdsong researchers, along with both CPP and WE, will allow characterization of similarities and differences among birds. Standard terminology and measures will improve accessibility of the birdsong literature to human voice researchers and vice versa.
AB - Purpose: The zebra finch is used as a model to study the neural circuitry of auditory-guided human vocal production. The terminology of birdsong production and acoustic analysis, however, differs from human voice production, making it difficult for voice researchers of either species to navigate the literature from the other. The purpose of this research note is to identify common terminology and measures to better compare information across species. Method: Terminology used in the birdsong literature will be mapped onto terminology used in the human voice production literature. Measures typically used to quantify the percepts of pitch, loudness, and quality will be described. Measures common to the literature in both species will be made from the songs of 3 middle-age birds using Praat and Song Analysis Pro. Two measures, cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and Wiener entropy (WE), will be compared to determine if they provide similar information. Results: Similarities and differences in terminology and acoustic analyses are presented. A core set of measures including frequency, frequency variability within a syllable, intensity, CPP, and WE are proposed for future studies. CPP and WE are related yet provide unique information about the syllable structure. Conclusions: Using a core set of measures familiar to both human voice and birdsong researchers, along with both CPP and WE, will allow characterization of similarities and differences among birds. Standard terminology and measures will improve accessibility of the birdsong literature to human voice researchers and vice versa.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064172315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064172315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0218
DO - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0218
M3 - Article
C2 - 30540871
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 62
SP - 60
EP - 69
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 1
ER -