Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing different indicators of quasar orientation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Radio core dominance, the rest-frame ratio of core to lobe luminosity, has been widely used as a measure of Doppler boosting of a quasar's radio jets and hence of the inclination of the central engine's spin axis to the line of sight. However, the use of the radio lobe luminosity in the denominator (essentially to try and factor out the intrinsic power of the central engine) has been criticized and other proxies for the intrinsic engine power have been proposed. These include the optical continuum luminosity, and the luminosity of the narrow-line region. Each is plausible, but so far none has been shown to be clearly better than the others. In this paper, we evaluate four different measures of core dominance using a new sample of 126 radio-loud quasars, carefully selected to be as free as possible of orientation bias, together with highquality Very Large Array images and optical spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find that normalizing the radio core luminosity by the optical continuum luminosity yields a demonstrably superior orientation indicator. In addition, by comparing the equivalent widths of broad emission lines in our orientation-unbiased sample to those of sources in the MOJAVE programme, we show that the beamed optical synchrotron emission from the jets is not a significant component of the optical continuum for the sources in our sample. We also discuss future applications of these results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4240-4247
Number of pages8
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume450
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 24 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Quasars: emission lines
  • quasars: general

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing different indicators of quasar orientation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this