Abstract
Differences in the methods of analysis of X-ray absorption data used by Powers et al. [Powers, L., Blumberg, W. E., Chance, B., Barlow, C., Leigh, J., Jr., Smith, J., Yonetani, T., Vik, S., & Peisach, J. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 547, 520-538; Powers, L., Chance, B., Ching, Y., & Angiolillo, P. (1981) Biophys. J. 34, 465-498] and Scott et al. [Scott, R., Schwartz, J., & Cramer, S. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 5546-5555] are clarified. In addition, we compare the X-ray absorption data and results for resting cytochrome c oxidase reported by both groups using the same analysis method and conclude apart from any assumptions that the data are not identical.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4461-4468 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Biochemistry |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1989 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the Data, Analysis, and Results of X-ray Absorption Studies of Cytochrome c Oxidase'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS