Control Balance Behind Bars: Testing the Generality of Tittle’s Theory Among Incarcerated Men and Women

Kathleen Talbot, Matt R. Nobles, Jodi Lane

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The current study contributes to the small, but growing, body of literature testing Tittle’s control balance theory by offering a unique test of the theory’s ability to explain a wide variety of offending among a large sample of recently incarcerated jail inmates. Among the full sample of inmates, both control deficits and surpluses significantly increase the risk of offending. When men and women are examined separately, control deficits are non-significant while control surpluses continue to increase offending, and this effect does not significantly vary among men and women. Evidence from the interactive effects of control imbalance and self-control indicate that control surpluses and low self-control are also related to committing a wider variety of crimes.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)925-953
    Number of pages29
    JournalCrime and Delinquency
    Volume62
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

    Keywords

    • control balance theory
    • gender
    • jail inmates
    • offending variety

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Control Balance Behind Bars: Testing the Generality of Tittle’s Theory Among Incarcerated Men and Women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this