TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum
T2 - Novel Meiotic miRNAs and Indications for a Role of PhasiRNAs in Meiosis (Frontiers in Plant Science, (2016), 7, 10.3389/fpls.2016.00762)
AU - Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie
AU - Sundararajan, Anitha
AU - Ramaraj, Thiruvarangan
AU - Kianian, Shahryar
AU - Pawlowski, Wojciech P.
AU - Mudge, Joann
AU - Chen, Changbin
N1 - Funding Information: This work was partially supported by the Polish Central Research Programme CPBP - 01.09 No III.I.2.12 and by Ministerium fUr Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen and the Bundesministerium fUr Forschung und Technologie. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2020 Dukowic-Schulze, Sundararajan, Ramaraj, Kianian, Pawlowski, Mudge and Chen.
PY - 2020/6/4
Y1 - 2020/6/4
N2 - In the original article, there was a mistake in Figures 4A–C and Figure 5A as published. The figures depicting DNA methylation underrepresented the true DNA methylation in our samples and in maize in general. The underlying computation made use of the average DNA methylation in 100 bp tiles. However, there were tiles that either had no DNA methylation sites or had no read calls at existing DNA methylation sites. Instead of disregarding these instances, tiles with non-existent values were used in the original computation as the value “0%.” We now removed any instances of tiles with unknown or absent DNA methylation information. Due to the different likelihoods of these instances in different contexts, substantial differences in the calculated DNA methylation percentage occurred in the CG context, less in the CHG and almost none in the CHH context (H=A, T, or C). The higher DNAmethylation percentages in the corrected graphs agree with other maize DNA methylation data. The correction did not change the previously described qualitative outcomes. The corrected Figures 4A–C and Figure 5A appear below. The following sections have been updated correspondingly. In addition, since two of the authors changed institutions by now, their new affiliations are listed in the author section of this corrigendum. (Figure presented.).
AB - In the original article, there was a mistake in Figures 4A–C and Figure 5A as published. The figures depicting DNA methylation underrepresented the true DNA methylation in our samples and in maize in general. The underlying computation made use of the average DNA methylation in 100 bp tiles. However, there were tiles that either had no DNA methylation sites or had no read calls at existing DNA methylation sites. Instead of disregarding these instances, tiles with non-existent values were used in the original computation as the value “0%.” We now removed any instances of tiles with unknown or absent DNA methylation information. Due to the different likelihoods of these instances in different contexts, substantial differences in the calculated DNA methylation percentage occurred in the CG context, less in the CHG and almost none in the CHH context (H=A, T, or C). The higher DNAmethylation percentages in the corrected graphs agree with other maize DNA methylation data. The correction did not change the previously described qualitative outcomes. The corrected Figures 4A–C and Figure 5A appear below. The following sections have been updated correspondingly. In addition, since two of the authors changed institutions by now, their new affiliations are listed in the author section of this corrigendum. (Figure presented.).
KW - DNA methylation
KW - bisulfite sequencing
KW - maize
KW - meiocytes
KW - meiosis
KW - phasiRNA
KW - sRNA-seq
KW - small RNA
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086773745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086773745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpls.2020.00653
DO - 10.3389/fpls.2020.00653
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 1664-462X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Plant Science
JF - Frontiers in Plant Science
M1 - 653
ER -