TY - JOUR
T1 - Does a Speaker’s (In)formal Role in News Media Shape Perceptions of Political Incivility?
AU - Conway, Bethany Anne
AU - Stryker, Robin
N1 - Funding Information: A grant to Robin Stryker from the University of Arizona Confluencenter for Creative Inquiry, a UA Graduate Incentives in Growth Award to Robin Stryker, and the UA’s National Institute for Civil Discourse supported this research. Authorship is alphabetical. The authors contributed equally to this manuscript. We thank Zachary Schrank and J. Taylor Danielson for helping us construct our vignettes and manipulation checks, and we thank Richard Serpe for technical advice. The second author thanks the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University (2016–17) for providing a congenial place to think, write, and design new research. We presented a prior version of this paper at the 2019 International Communication Association conference in Washington, D.C. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Broadcast Education Association.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We used a media-focused vignette experiment to test how speaker role and norm-violation level influenced perceived incivility, including respondents’ age, gender, and partisanship as covariates. One vignette involved deception regarding immigration in political talk radio; the other involved epithetic name-calling in televised political talk regarding state-funded contraception. Respondents perceived the same deception as more uncivil when from a talk radio host-pundit relative to a call-in listener. Respondents did not perceive the same name calling as more uncivil when from a TV interviewer than from a citizen panelist. Covariate effects were found for name-calling, but not deception. Overall findings suggest Americans still hold media practitioners to a higher standard of truthfulness and that reactions to incivility are contextual.
AB - We used a media-focused vignette experiment to test how speaker role and norm-violation level influenced perceived incivility, including respondents’ age, gender, and partisanship as covariates. One vignette involved deception regarding immigration in political talk radio; the other involved epithetic name-calling in televised political talk regarding state-funded contraception. Respondents perceived the same deception as more uncivil when from a talk radio host-pundit relative to a call-in listener. Respondents did not perceive the same name calling as more uncivil when from a TV interviewer than from a citizen panelist. Covariate effects were found for name-calling, but not deception. Overall findings suggest Americans still hold media practitioners to a higher standard of truthfulness and that reactions to incivility are contextual.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103651880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103651880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08838151.2021.1897819
DO - 10.1080/08838151.2021.1897819
M3 - Article
SN - 0883-8151
VL - 65
SP - 24
EP - 45
JO - Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media
JF - Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media
IS - 1
ER -