TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management for Social–Ecological Systems
T2 - Renewing the Focus in the United States with Next Generation Fishery Ecosystem Plans
AU - Marshall, Kristin N.
AU - Levin, Phillip S.
AU - Essington, Timothy E.
AU - Koehn, Laura E.
AU - Anderson, Lee G.
AU - Bundy, Alida
AU - Carothers, Courtney
AU - Coleman, Felicia
AU - Gerber, Leah
AU - Grabowski, Jonathan H.
AU - Houde, Edward
AU - Jensen, Olaf P.
AU - Möllmann, Christian
AU - Rose, Kenneth
AU - Sanchirico, James N.
AU - Smith, Anthony D.M.
N1 - Funding Information: This work emerged from meetings and discussions of the Lenfest Fishery Ecosystem Task Force, convened and supported by the Lenfest Ocean Program. We thank the Advisory Panel for their helpful feedback. The manuscript was improved by suggestions from Anthony Charles and two anonymous reviewers. The views stated here do not represent those of NOAA Fisheries nor the views of the Lenfest Ocean Program. Publisher Copyright: Copyright and Photocopying: © 2017 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Resource managers and policy makers have long recognized the importance of considering fisheries in the context of ecosystems; yet, movement towards widespread Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management (EBFM) has been slow. A conceptual reframing of fisheries management is occurring globally, which envisions fisheries as systems with interacting biophysical and human subsystems. This broader view, along with a process for decision making, can facilitate implementation of EBFM. A pathway to achieve these broadened objectives of EBFM in the United States is a Fishery Ecosystem Plan (FEP). The first generation of FEPs was conceived in the late 1990s as voluntary guidance documents that Regional Fishery Management Councils could adopt to develop and guide their ecosystem-based fisheries management decisions, but few of these FEPs took concrete steps to implement EBFM. Here, we emphasize the need for a new generation of FEPs that provide practical mechanisms for putting EBFM into practice in the United States. We argue that next-generation FEPs can balance environmental, economic, and social objectives—the triple bottom line—to improve long-term planning for fishery systems.
AB - Resource managers and policy makers have long recognized the importance of considering fisheries in the context of ecosystems; yet, movement towards widespread Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management (EBFM) has been slow. A conceptual reframing of fisheries management is occurring globally, which envisions fisheries as systems with interacting biophysical and human subsystems. This broader view, along with a process for decision making, can facilitate implementation of EBFM. A pathway to achieve these broadened objectives of EBFM in the United States is a Fishery Ecosystem Plan (FEP). The first generation of FEPs was conceived in the late 1990s as voluntary guidance documents that Regional Fishery Management Councils could adopt to develop and guide their ecosystem-based fisheries management decisions, but few of these FEPs took concrete steps to implement EBFM. Here, we emphasize the need for a new generation of FEPs that provide practical mechanisms for putting EBFM into practice in the United States. We argue that next-generation FEPs can balance environmental, economic, and social objectives—the triple bottom line—to improve long-term planning for fishery systems.
KW - Ecosystem-based fisheries management
KW - Fishery Ecosystem Plan
KW - adaptive management
KW - fishery system
KW - social–ecological system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041832433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041832433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/conl.12367
DO - 10.1111/conl.12367
M3 - Article
SN - 1755-263X
VL - 11
JO - Conservation Letters
JF - Conservation Letters
IS - 1
M1 - e12367
ER -