TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of bilateral automatic gain control synchronization in cochlear implants with and without head movements
T2 - Sound source localization in the frontal hemifield
AU - Pastore, M. Torben
AU - Pulling, Kathryn R.
AU - Chen, Chen
AU - Yost, William A.
N1 - Funding Information: Research was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders Grant 5R01DC015214 (W. A. Y.) and Facebook Reality Labs (W. A. Y. and M. T. P.) and National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders Grant F32DC017676 (M. T. P.). Expenses related to testing cochlear implant patients were paid for in a grant from Advanced Bionics to Michael F. Dorman. Chen Chen is an employee of Advanced Bionics, and only participated in the programming of the cochlear implant processors and some aspects of experimental design (not in data collection, data analysis, or interpretation). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Purpose: For bilaterally implanted patients, the automatic gain control (AGC) in both left and right cochlear implant (CI) processors is usually neither linked nor synchronized. At high AGC compression ratios, this lack of coordination between the two processors can distort interaural level differences, the only useful interaural difference cue available to CI patients. This study assessed the improvement, if any, in the utility of interaural level differences for sound source localization in the frontal hemifield when AGCs were synchronized versus independent and when listeners were stationary versus allowed to move their heads. Method: Sound source identification of broadband noise stimuli was tested for seven bilateral CI patients using 13 loudspeakers in the frontal hemifield, under conditions where AGCs were linked and unlinked. For half the conditions, patients remained stationary; in the other half, they were encouraged to rotate or reorient their heads within a range of approximately ± 30° during sound presentation. Results: In general, those listeners who already localized reasonably well with independent AGCs gained the least from AGC synchronization, perhaps because there was less room for improvement. Those listeners who performed worst with independent AGCs gained the most from synchronization. All listeners performed as well or better with synchronization than without; however, intersubject variability was high. Head movements had little impact on the effectiveness of synchronization of AGCs. Conclusion: Synchronization of AGCs offers one promising strategy for improving localization performance in the frontal hemifield for bilaterally implanted CI patients.
AB - Purpose: For bilaterally implanted patients, the automatic gain control (AGC) in both left and right cochlear implant (CI) processors is usually neither linked nor synchronized. At high AGC compression ratios, this lack of coordination between the two processors can distort interaural level differences, the only useful interaural difference cue available to CI patients. This study assessed the improvement, if any, in the utility of interaural level differences for sound source localization in the frontal hemifield when AGCs were synchronized versus independent and when listeners were stationary versus allowed to move their heads. Method: Sound source identification of broadband noise stimuli was tested for seven bilateral CI patients using 13 loudspeakers in the frontal hemifield, under conditions where AGCs were linked and unlinked. For half the conditions, patients remained stationary; in the other half, they were encouraged to rotate or reorient their heads within a range of approximately ± 30° during sound presentation. Results: In general, those listeners who already localized reasonably well with independent AGCs gained the least from AGC synchronization, perhaps because there was less room for improvement. Those listeners who performed worst with independent AGCs gained the most from synchronization. All listeners performed as well or better with synchronization than without; however, intersubject variability was high. Head movements had little impact on the effectiveness of synchronization of AGCs. Conclusion: Synchronization of AGCs offers one promising strategy for improving localization performance in the frontal hemifield for bilaterally implanted CI patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111399313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111399313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00493
DO - https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00493
M3 - Article
C2 - 34100627
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 64
SP - 2811
EP - 2824
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 7
ER -