TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of meteorological forcing uncertainty on high-resolution snow modeling and streamflow prediction in a mountainous karst watershed
AU - Tyson, Conor
AU - Longyang, Qianqiu
AU - Neilson, Bethany T.
AU - Zeng, Ruijie
AU - Xu, Tianfang
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - In the mountainous Western U.S., a considerable portion of water supply originates as snowmelt passing through karst watersheds. Accurately simulating streamflow in snow-dominated, karst basins is important for water resources management. However, this has been challenging due to high spatiotemporal variability of meteorological and hydrogeological processes in these watersheds and scarcity of climate stations. To overcome these challenges, a physically based snow model is used to simulate snow processes at 100 m resolution, and the calculated snowmelt and potential evapotranspiration rates are fed into a deep learning model to simulate streamflow. The snow model was driven by meteorological variables from a regional scale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model or from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2). The two datasets were used both at the original resolution and downscaled to 100 m resolution based on orographic adjustments, leading to four sets of forcings. Snow model simulation results from the four sets of forcings showed large differences in simulated snow water equivalent (SWE) and snowmelt rate and timing. However, the differences were damped in simulated streamflow, as the deep learning model is partially immune to input bias and picked up different streamflow responses to snowmelt and rainfall when trained using snow model results. While the meteorological datasets considered yielded close streamflow simulation accuracy, averaging simulated streamflow from the four sets of forcings consistently achieved better performance, suggesting the value of including multiple meteorological datasets for modeling streamflow in mountainous watersheds.
AB - In the mountainous Western U.S., a considerable portion of water supply originates as snowmelt passing through karst watersheds. Accurately simulating streamflow in snow-dominated, karst basins is important for water resources management. However, this has been challenging due to high spatiotemporal variability of meteorological and hydrogeological processes in these watersheds and scarcity of climate stations. To overcome these challenges, a physically based snow model is used to simulate snow processes at 100 m resolution, and the calculated snowmelt and potential evapotranspiration rates are fed into a deep learning model to simulate streamflow. The snow model was driven by meteorological variables from a regional scale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model or from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2). The two datasets were used both at the original resolution and downscaled to 100 m resolution based on orographic adjustments, leading to four sets of forcings. Snow model simulation results from the four sets of forcings showed large differences in simulated snow water equivalent (SWE) and snowmelt rate and timing. However, the differences were damped in simulated streamflow, as the deep learning model is partially immune to input bias and picked up different streamflow responses to snowmelt and rainfall when trained using snow model results. While the meteorological datasets considered yielded close streamflow simulation accuracy, averaging simulated streamflow from the four sets of forcings consistently achieved better performance, suggesting the value of including multiple meteorological datasets for modeling streamflow in mountainous watersheds.
KW - Deep learning
KW - Downscaling
KW - Karst
KW - Meteorological uncertainty
KW - Rainfall-runoff modeling
KW - Snow hydrology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149334355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149334355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129304
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129304
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 619
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
M1 - 129304
ER -