Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment

Birendra Adhikari, Nighat A. Chowdhury, Luis A. Diaz, Hongyue Jin, Apurba K. Saha, Meng Shi, John R. Klaehn, Tedd E. Lister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

The manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries (LIB) requires critical materials such as cobalt (Co) and lithium (Li) that are essential for clean-energy products including electric vehicles. Because of their rapidly increasing demand and limited supply, the recycle and reuse of these materials from end-of-life LIB have garnered a lot of interest. Electrochemical leaching has emerged as a sustainable method to extract critical materials out of LIB, so life cycle assessment was conducted to compare the environmental impacts with traditional peroxide-based leaching and another emerging technology – SO2-based leaching. The results showed that electrochemical leaching reduces the global warming potential (GWP) by 80%−87% compared to peroxide-based leaching due to a lower acid consumption, avoidance of hydrogen peroxide, and regeneration of reducing agent iron (II) sulfate and compares well with SO2-based leaching in most impact categories. The analysis suggested renewable energy can further reduce the environment footprint of electrochemical leaching.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number106973
JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
Volume193
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Circular economy
  • Environmental impact
  • Peroxide-based leaching
  • SO leaching
  • Value recovery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this