TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrophysiological responses to argument structure violations in healthy adults and individuals with agrammatic aphasia
AU - Kielar, Aneta
AU - Meltzer-Asscher, Aya
AU - Thompson, Cynthia K.
N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by the NIH / NIDCD-R01-DC01948-18 to C.K. Thompson. The authors wish to thank Sladjana Lukic and Elena Barbieri for assistance with data collection. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for numerous helpful comments.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Sentence comprehension requires processing of argument structure information associated with verbs, i.e. the number and type of arguments that they select. Many individuals with agrammatic aphasia show impaired production of verbs with greater argument structure density. The extent to which these participants also show argument structure deficits during comprehension, however, is unclear. Some studies find normal access to verb arguments, whereas others report impaired ability. The present study investigated verb argument structure processing in agrammatic aphasia by examining event-related potentials associated with argument structure violations in healthy young and older adults as well as aphasic individuals. A semantic violation condition was included to investigate possible differences in sensitivity to semantic and argument structure information during sentence processing. Results for the healthy control participants showed a negativity followed by a positive shift (N400-P600) in the argument structure violation condition, as found in previous ERP studies (Friederici & Frisch, 2000; Frisch, Hahne, & Friederici, 2004). In contrast, individuals with agrammatic aphasia showed a P600, but no N400, response to argument structure mismatches. Additionally, compared to the control groups, the agrammatic participants showed an attenuated, but relatively preserved, N400 response to semantic violations. These data show that agrammatic individuals do not demonstrate normal real-time sensitivity to verb argument structure requirements during sentence processing.
AB - Sentence comprehension requires processing of argument structure information associated with verbs, i.e. the number and type of arguments that they select. Many individuals with agrammatic aphasia show impaired production of verbs with greater argument structure density. The extent to which these participants also show argument structure deficits during comprehension, however, is unclear. Some studies find normal access to verb arguments, whereas others report impaired ability. The present study investigated verb argument structure processing in agrammatic aphasia by examining event-related potentials associated with argument structure violations in healthy young and older adults as well as aphasic individuals. A semantic violation condition was included to investigate possible differences in sensitivity to semantic and argument structure information during sentence processing. Results for the healthy control participants showed a negativity followed by a positive shift (N400-P600) in the argument structure violation condition, as found in previous ERP studies (Friederici & Frisch, 2000; Frisch, Hahne, & Friederici, 2004). In contrast, individuals with agrammatic aphasia showed a P600, but no N400, response to argument structure mismatches. Additionally, compared to the control groups, the agrammatic participants showed an attenuated, but relatively preserved, N400 response to semantic violations. These data show that agrammatic individuals do not demonstrate normal real-time sensitivity to verb argument structure requirements during sentence processing.
KW - Agrammatic aphasia
KW - Event related potentials
KW - Language-related brain potentials
KW - N400
KW - P600
KW - Semantic processing
KW - Verb argument structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868316042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868316042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.013
DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 23022079
SN - 0028-3932
VL - 50
SP - 3320
EP - 3337
JO - Neuropsychologia
JF - Neuropsychologia
IS - 14
ER -