TY - JOUR
T1 - Embodied rationality
T2 - a framework of human action in water infrastructure governance
AU - Manheim, Marisa K.
AU - Spackman, Christy
N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by Arizona State University’s School for the Future of Innovation in Society and Earth System Science for the Anthropocene , and the Morrison Neely Foundation . The authors appreciate valuable input from Hallie Eakin, Art Glenberg and two anonymous reviewers. Funding Information: This research was supported by Arizona State University's School for the Future of Innovation in Society and Earth System Science for the Anthropocene, and the Morrison Neely Foundation. The authors appreciate valuable input from Hallie Eakin, Art Glenberg and two anonymous reviewers. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Critics assert that prevailing assumptions of human behavior limit pathways for infrastructure adaptations. Embodied rationality offers scholars and practitioners an alternative framework that characterizes rational decisions as those producing adaptive outcomes for human–nature systems. By emphasizing the body's role in perception, embodied rationality provides a bridge between relational and individualistic conceptions of human–nature. It also facilitates theorizing infrastructures as inherently co-constructed. Practices based on embodied rationality can increase knowledge pluralism in planning and help infrastructure managers avoid costly mistakes. Water managers activate embodied rationality when offering tastings to engage consumers in deliberations about the direct potable reuse of wastewater. Embodied rationality, therefore, offers a timely framework of particular relevance to the governance of contested sustainability transitions.
AB - Critics assert that prevailing assumptions of human behavior limit pathways for infrastructure adaptations. Embodied rationality offers scholars and practitioners an alternative framework that characterizes rational decisions as those producing adaptive outcomes for human–nature systems. By emphasizing the body's role in perception, embodied rationality provides a bridge between relational and individualistic conceptions of human–nature. It also facilitates theorizing infrastructures as inherently co-constructed. Practices based on embodied rationality can increase knowledge pluralism in planning and help infrastructure managers avoid costly mistakes. Water managers activate embodied rationality when offering tastings to engage consumers in deliberations about the direct potable reuse of wastewater. Embodied rationality, therefore, offers a timely framework of particular relevance to the governance of contested sustainability transitions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129951667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129951667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101170
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101170
M3 - Review article
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 56
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
M1 - 101170
ER -