TY - JOUR
T1 - Empowering Teachers With Low-Intensity Strategies to Support Instruction
T2 - Within-Activity Choices in Third-Grade Math With Null Effects
AU - Ennis, Robin Parks
AU - Lane, Kathleen Lynne
AU - Oakes, Wendy
N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project is funded by the Institute of Education Sciences Special Education—Research and Innovation to Improve Services and Results for Children With Disabilities—Project Empowering Teachers With Low-Intensity Strategies to Support Instruction II–R324B150028. Publisher Copyright: © 2017, © Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2017.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Instructional choice is a low-intensity strategy that can improve academic engagement. In this study, we investigated the effects of within-activity choices offered during math by third-grade teachers to participating students with behavioral and academic needs. We utilized a professional development model to train teachers to implement instructional choice in the classroom while collecting direct observation data on student’s academic engagement. Teachers were able to implement practices with high levels of integrity and collect momentary time sampling data on one student with high levels of reliability. Using a withdrawal design, we found no clear functional relation between instructional choice and increases in student’s academic engagement. However, some students demonstrated an increase in level upon the introduction of the intervention. Both teachers and students rated the intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes as acceptable. Possible reasons for a lack of treatment effect on student academic engagement are discussed.
AB - Instructional choice is a low-intensity strategy that can improve academic engagement. In this study, we investigated the effects of within-activity choices offered during math by third-grade teachers to participating students with behavioral and academic needs. We utilized a professional development model to train teachers to implement instructional choice in the classroom while collecting direct observation data on student’s academic engagement. Teachers were able to implement practices with high levels of integrity and collect momentary time sampling data on one student with high levels of reliability. Using a withdrawal design, we found no clear functional relation between instructional choice and increases in student’s academic engagement. However, some students demonstrated an increase in level upon the introduction of the intervention. Both teachers and students rated the intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes as acceptable. Possible reasons for a lack of treatment effect on student academic engagement are discussed.
KW - Tier 2
KW - behavior challenges
KW - instructional choice
KW - low-intensity supports
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044416783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044416783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0741932517734634
DO - 10.1177/0741932517734634
M3 - Article
SN - 0741-9325
VL - 39
SP - 77
EP - 94
JO - Remedial and Special Education
JF - Remedial and Special Education
IS - 2
ER -