TY - GEN
T1 - End-user customization of affective tactile messages
T2 - 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium, HAPTICS 2014
AU - Seifi, Hasti
AU - Anthonypillai, Chamila
AU - Maclean, Karon E.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Vibrotactile (VT) signals are found today in many everyday electronic devices (e.g., notification of cellphone messages or calls); but it remains a challenge to design engaging, understandable vibrations to accommodate a broad range of preferences. Here, we examine customization as a way to leverage the affective qualities of vibrations and satisfy diverse tastes; specifically, the desirability and composition of VT customization tools for end-users. A review of existing design and customization tools (haptic and otherwise) yielded five parameters in which such tools can vary: 1) size of design space, 2) granularity of control, 3) provided design framework, 4) facilitated parameter(s), and 5) clarity of design alternatives. We varied these parameters within low-fidelity prototypes of three customization tools, modeled in some respects on existing popular examples. Results of a Wizard-of-Oz study confirm users' general interest in customizing everyday VT signals. Although common in consumer devices, choosing from a list of presets was the least preferred, whereas an option allowing users to balance VT design control with convenience was favored. We report users' opinion of the three tools, and link our findings to the five characterizing parameters for customization tools that we have proposed.
AB - Vibrotactile (VT) signals are found today in many everyday electronic devices (e.g., notification of cellphone messages or calls); but it remains a challenge to design engaging, understandable vibrations to accommodate a broad range of preferences. Here, we examine customization as a way to leverage the affective qualities of vibrations and satisfy diverse tastes; specifically, the desirability and composition of VT customization tools for end-users. A review of existing design and customization tools (haptic and otherwise) yielded five parameters in which such tools can vary: 1) size of design space, 2) granularity of control, 3) provided design framework, 4) facilitated parameter(s), and 5) clarity of design alternatives. We varied these parameters within low-fidelity prototypes of three customization tools, modeled in some respects on existing popular examples. Results of a Wizard-of-Oz study confirm users' general interest in customizing everyday VT signals. Although common in consumer devices, choosing from a list of presets was the least preferred, whereas an option allowing users to balance VT design control with convenience was favored. We report users' opinion of the three tools, and link our findings to the five characterizing parameters for customization tools that we have proposed.
KW - End-User Customization
KW - H.1.2 [User/Machine Systems]: Human factors?Haptic Tools
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84899573078
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84899573078#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/HAPTICS.2014.6775463
DO - 10.1109/HAPTICS.2014.6775463
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9781479931316
T3 - IEEE Haptics Symposium, HAPTICS
SP - 251
EP - 256
BT - IEEE Haptics Symposium 2014, HAPTICS 2014 - Proceedings
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 23 February 2014 through 26 February 2014
ER -