TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships
AU - van Raalte, Lisa J.
AU - Bednarchik, Lori A.
AU - Generous, Mark A.
AU - Mongeau, Paul A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Establishing communicative and behavioral boundaries in romantic relationships provides partners with a greater sense of relational stability and certainty. For romantic relationships, these boundaries, such as sexual exclusivity, are relatively straightforward. For casual sex relationships, however, the relational rules are less stable and certain. This exploratory study examined rules in friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) for 109 college students in the USA. Responses to open-ended questions were collected through an online questionnaire, and data were qualitatively analyzed through an inductive thematic analysis. The data were structured into communication rules, sexual rules, and relational definition rules. Results provide overlap and extension of previous work investigating rules in FWBRs. Notably, participants reported sexual exclusivity as an important rule. Additionally, potentially competing discourses in FWBR rules were best understood through the lens of relational dialectics. Findings reflect a tension in terms of relational work, as partners struggle with maintaining their sexual and friendship relationship while not falling into the “territory” of romantic relationships.
AB - Establishing communicative and behavioral boundaries in romantic relationships provides partners with a greater sense of relational stability and certainty. For romantic relationships, these boundaries, such as sexual exclusivity, are relatively straightforward. For casual sex relationships, however, the relational rules are less stable and certain. This exploratory study examined rules in friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) for 109 college students in the USA. Responses to open-ended questions were collected through an online questionnaire, and data were qualitatively analyzed through an inductive thematic analysis. The data were structured into communication rules, sexual rules, and relational definition rules. Results provide overlap and extension of previous work investigating rules in FWBRs. Notably, participants reported sexual exclusivity as an important rule. Additionally, potentially competing discourses in FWBR rules were best understood through the lens of relational dialectics. Findings reflect a tension in terms of relational work, as partners struggle with maintaining their sexual and friendship relationship while not falling into the “territory” of romantic relationships.
KW - Friends with benefits relationships
KW - Relational dialectics
KW - Relational rules
KW - Relationship talk
KW - Sexual communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119038795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119038795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10508-021-02114-5
DO - 10.1007/s10508-021-02114-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 34779977
SN - 0004-0002
VL - 51
SP - 1783
EP - 1792
JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior
JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior
IS - 3
ER -