TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining Visitor Collected Species Data from Denali National Park and Preserve
AU - Fischer, Heather
AU - Wentz, Elizabeth
AU - Gerber, Leah
N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to acknowledge the volunteers who participated in and continue to participate in Map of Life. Walter Jetz and the Map of Life team at Yale University, Denali National Park and Preserve staff and administration, and Denali Backcountry lodge staff. This research was made possible by the Melvin G. Marcus Memorial Fellowship. Funding Information: This research was made possible by the Melvin G. Marcus Memorial Fellowship. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In citizen science programs, the concept of “participant” is often used as a catch-all without considering how different participants (e.g., young, old, wealthy, poor, differentlyabled, local inhabitants, and visitors) affect scientific outcomes of citizen science programs (e.g., the data collection, data analysis, publications, etc.). This research advances the understanding of tourist participants’ ability to produce data comparable to participants who live near the study area. To examine data collected by tourist participants, we performed a case study on wildlife observation data collected through the Map of Life-Denali program in Denali National Park and Preserve in Alaska, USA. The species observation data collected by tourists and Alaska Residents were compared visually using heatmaps and statistically with the Ripley’s K function variation, the L function. Results from the analysis show that the tourist and resident data have similar point patterns for the three species we compared, Ursus arctos (Grizzly Bear), Rangifer tarandus (Caribou), and Alces alces (Moose). Our results indicate that tourists can be effective citizen science participants. And show the potential for leveraging this large pool of untapped participants in popular tourist destinations such as U.S. National Parks.
AB - In citizen science programs, the concept of “participant” is often used as a catch-all without considering how different participants (e.g., young, old, wealthy, poor, differentlyabled, local inhabitants, and visitors) affect scientific outcomes of citizen science programs (e.g., the data collection, data analysis, publications, etc.). This research advances the understanding of tourist participants’ ability to produce data comparable to participants who live near the study area. To examine data collected by tourist participants, we performed a case study on wildlife observation data collected through the Map of Life-Denali program in Denali National Park and Preserve in Alaska, USA. The species observation data collected by tourists and Alaska Residents were compared visually using heatmaps and statistically with the Ripley’s K function variation, the L function. Results from the analysis show that the tourist and resident data have similar point patterns for the three species we compared, Ursus arctos (Grizzly Bear), Rangifer tarandus (Caribou), and Alces alces (Moose). Our results indicate that tourists can be effective citizen science participants. And show the potential for leveraging this large pool of untapped participants in popular tourist destinations such as U.S. National Parks.
KW - Volunteered geographic information
KW - citizen science
KW - data quality
KW - national parks
KW - tourism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163151017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85163151017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5334/cstp.475
DO - 10.5334/cstp.475
M3 - Article
SN - 2057-4991
VL - 8
JO - Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
JF - Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
IS - 1
M1 - cstp.475
ER -