TY - JOUR
T1 - Expanding the scope of grammatical variation
T2 - towards a comprehensive account of genitive variation across registers
AU - Biber, Douglas
AU - Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
AU - Reppen, Randi
AU - Larsson, Tove
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2023.
PY - 2024/3/7
Y1 - 2024/3/7
N2 - Most studies of genitive variation in English have considered only the choice of two variants (’s versus of), based on analysis of only tokens that are judged to be interchangeable. We argue in the present article that research on genitive variation can be usefully extended in both respects: including premodifying nouns as a third variant; and attempting to account for all tokens of the genitive. In addition, we extend the scope of analysis to explore the possibility of contextual constraints having different importance in different registers. First, we carry out a text-linguistic analysis comparing the rates of genitive variants in texts from three registers (conversation, newspaper reports, academic articles), showing that genitives overall are much more frequent in written registers, with the premodifying noun variant being especially frequent. Then, a variationist analysis is undertaken to account for the choice of genitive variant in particular contexts and registers. A total of 3,425 genitive tokens were coded for ten contextual characteristics (e.g. length of the Modifying NP, semantic category of the Modifying noun and the Head noun, final sibilancy of the Modifying noun). Statistical analyses with random forests and conditional inference trees are triangulated, showing how contextual factors interact in predicting the use of each genitive variant – and how patterns of variation differ across registers.
AB - Most studies of genitive variation in English have considered only the choice of two variants (’s versus of), based on analysis of only tokens that are judged to be interchangeable. We argue in the present article that research on genitive variation can be usefully extended in both respects: including premodifying nouns as a third variant; and attempting to account for all tokens of the genitive. In addition, we extend the scope of analysis to explore the possibility of contextual constraints having different importance in different registers. First, we carry out a text-linguistic analysis comparing the rates of genitive variants in texts from three registers (conversation, newspaper reports, academic articles), showing that genitives overall are much more frequent in written registers, with the premodifying noun variant being especially frequent. Then, a variationist analysis is undertaken to account for the choice of genitive variant in particular contexts and registers. A total of 3,425 genitive tokens were coded for ten contextual characteristics (e.g. length of the Modifying NP, semantic category of the Modifying noun and the Head noun, final sibilancy of the Modifying noun). Statistical analyses with random forests and conditional inference trees are triangulated, showing how contextual factors interact in predicting the use of each genitive variant – and how patterns of variation differ across registers.
KW - genitives
KW - premodifying nouns
KW - register variation
KW - text-linguistic versus variationist analyses
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181024194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181024194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1360674323000497
DO - 10.1017/S1360674323000497
M3 - Article
SN - 1360-6743
VL - 28
SP - 95
EP - 133
JO - English Language and Linguistics
JF - English Language and Linguistics
IS - 1
ER -