Green's rights recognition thesis and moral internalism

Gerald F. Gaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

T. H. Green claimed that 'rights are made by recognition. There is no right but thinking makes it so'. This 'rights recognition thesis' is widely rejected. I argue in this article that, so far from being an idiosyncratic doctrine of 19th-century British Idealism, the rights recognition thesis implies a compelling conception of rights, and one that, surprisingly, is more in tune with contemporary meta-ethics than are many contemporary rights theories. Green's moral theory, I argue, is a form of the widely embraced doctrine of 'moral internalism'. Such internalism, conjoined with a generally embraced analysis of rights, leads to some version of the rights recognition thesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-17
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Green's rights recognition thesis and moral internalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this