TY - JOUR
T1 - Halo model analysis of cluster statistics
AU - Rozo, Eduardo
AU - Dodelson, Scott
AU - Frieman, Joshua A.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - We use the halo model formalism to provide expressions for cluster abundances and bias, as well as estimates for the correlation matrix between these observables. Off-diagonal elements due to scatter in the mass-tracer scaling with mass are included, as are observational effects such as biases/scatter in the data, detection rates (completeness), and false detections (purity). We apply the formalism to a hypothetical volume limited optical survey where the cluster mass-tracer is chosen to be the number of satellite galaxies assigned to a cluster. Such a survey can strongly constrain [Formula Presented] ([Formula Presented]), the power law index [Formula Presented] where [Formula Presented] ([Formula Presented]), and perhaps even the Hubble parameter ([Formula Presented]). We find cluster abundances and bias are not well suited for constraining [Formula Presented] or the amplitude [Formula Presented]. We also find that without bias information [Formula Presented] and [Formula Presented] are degenerate, implying constraints on the former are strongly dependent on priors used for the latter and vice-versa. The degeneracy stems from an intrinsic scaling relation of the halo mass function, and hence it should be present regardless of the mass-tracer used in the survey.
AB - We use the halo model formalism to provide expressions for cluster abundances and bias, as well as estimates for the correlation matrix between these observables. Off-diagonal elements due to scatter in the mass-tracer scaling with mass are included, as are observational effects such as biases/scatter in the data, detection rates (completeness), and false detections (purity). We apply the formalism to a hypothetical volume limited optical survey where the cluster mass-tracer is chosen to be the number of satellite galaxies assigned to a cluster. Such a survey can strongly constrain [Formula Presented] ([Formula Presented]), the power law index [Formula Presented] where [Formula Presented] ([Formula Presented]), and perhaps even the Hubble parameter ([Formula Presented]). We find cluster abundances and bias are not well suited for constraining [Formula Presented] or the amplitude [Formula Presented]. We also find that without bias information [Formula Presented] and [Formula Presented] are degenerate, implying constraints on the former are strongly dependent on priors used for the latter and vice-versa. The degeneracy stems from an intrinsic scaling relation of the halo mass function, and hence it should be present regardless of the mass-tracer used in the survey.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927743509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927743509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083008
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083008
M3 - Article
SN - 1550-7998
VL - 70
JO - Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
JF - Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
IS - 8
ER -