TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of Multiracial Adolescents in Research Samples
T2 - An Examination and Critique of Existing Practices
AU - Mauer, Victoria
AU - Savell, Shannon
AU - Davis, Alida
AU - Wilson, Melvin N.
AU - Shaw, Daniel S.
AU - Lemery-Chalfant, Kathryn
N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Support for this research was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse to the fourth, fifth, and sixth authors (R01 DA023245 and R01 DA022773). The writing of this article was supported, in part, by a predoctoral fellowship received by the first listed author from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant #R305B140026 to the Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. We also wish to extend our appreciation to the staff and research participants of the Early Steps Multisite Study. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - This study examined caregivers’ longitudinal reports of adolescent multiracial categorization across the ages of 9.5, 10.5, and 14 years, and adolescents’ reports of their own multiracial categorization at the age of 14 years. A portion of caregivers’ reports of adolescent multiracial status were inconsistent across the years of the study; some adolescents’ and caregivers’ responses differed when questions assessing multiracial status were phrased in different ways; and adolescent and caregiver reports did not always align when adolescents were 14 years old. Given these findings, we recommend that researchers consider using multiple methods of racial data collection and collapsing the results to report estimated ranges of racial representation in samples, rather than specific percentages. Furthermore, when racial data must be provided by a single informant in the context of early adolescence, we suggest that researchers should think critically about which group’s perspective, adolescents’ or caregivers’, is more relevant to the research questions at hand.
AB - This study examined caregivers’ longitudinal reports of adolescent multiracial categorization across the ages of 9.5, 10.5, and 14 years, and adolescents’ reports of their own multiracial categorization at the age of 14 years. A portion of caregivers’ reports of adolescent multiracial status were inconsistent across the years of the study; some adolescents’ and caregivers’ responses differed when questions assessing multiracial status were phrased in different ways; and adolescent and caregiver reports did not always align when adolescents were 14 years old. Given these findings, we recommend that researchers consider using multiple methods of racial data collection and collapsing the results to report estimated ranges of racial representation in samples, rather than specific percentages. Furthermore, when racial data must be provided by a single informant in the context of early adolescence, we suggest that researchers should think critically about which group’s perspective, adolescents’ or caregivers’, is more relevant to the research questions at hand.
KW - at-risk/high-risk populations
KW - identity
KW - identity processes
KW - race/racial issues
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089786121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089786121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0272431620950471
DO - 10.1177/0272431620950471
M3 - Article
SN - 0272-4316
VL - 41
SP - 1338
EP - 1367
JO - Journal of Early Adolescence
JF - Journal of Early Adolescence
IS - 9
ER -