TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on true lumen helical morphology for Stanford type B dissections
AU - Bondesson, Johan
AU - Suh, Ga Young
AU - Marks, Neil
AU - Dake, Michael D.
AU - Lee, Jason T.
AU - Cheng, Christopher P.
N1 - Funding Information: Author conflict of interest: G.S. and C.C. have received unrestricted research funding from W. L. Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Endologix, and Bentley. G.S. and C.C. performed consulting work for Cordis and Terumo. M.D. is a consultant for W. L. Gore & Associates and Cook Medical. J.B., N.M., and J.L. have nothing to disclose. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Objective: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can change the morphology of the flow lumen in aortic dissections, which may affect aortic hemodynamics and function. This study characterizes how the helical morphology of the true lumen in type B aortic dissections is altered by TEVAR. Methods: Patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent computed tomography angiography before and after TEVAR were retrospectively reviewed. Images were used to construct three-dimensional stereolithographic surface models of the true lumen and whole aorta using custom software. Stereolithographic models were segmented and co-registered to determine helical morphology of the true lumen with respect to the whole aorta. The true lumen region covered by the endograft was defined based on fiducial markers before and after TEVAR. The helical angle, average helical twist, peak helical twist, and cross-sectional eccentricity, area, and circumference were quantified in this region for pre- and post-TEVAR geometries. Results: Sixteen patients (61.3 ± 8.0 years; 12.5% female) were treated successfully for type B dissection (5 acute and 11 chronic) with TEVAR and scans before and after TEVAR were retrospectively obtained (follow-up interval 52 ± 91 days). From before to after TEVAR, the true lumen helical angle (–70.0 ± 71.1 to –64.9 ± 75.4°; P =.782), average helical twist (–4.1 ± 4.0 to –3.7 ± 3.8°/cm; P =.674), and peak helical twist (–13.2 ± 15.2 to –15.4 ± 14.2°/cm; P =.629) did not change. However, the true lumen helical radius (1.4 ± 0.5 to 1.0 ± 0.6 cm; P <.05) and eccentricity (0.9 ± 0.1 to 0.7 ± 0.1; P <.05) decreased, and the cross-sectional area (3.0 ± 1.1 to 5.0 ± 2.0 cm2; P <.05) and circumference (7.1 ± 1.0 to 8.0 ± 1.4 cm; P <.05) increased significantly from before to after TEVAR. The distinct bimodal distribution of chiral and achiral native dissections disappeared after TEVAR, and subgroup analyses showed that the true lumen circumference of acute dissections increased with TEVAR, although it did not for chronic dissections. Conclusions: The unchanged helical angle and average and peak helical twists as a result of TEVAR suggest that the angular positions of the true lumen are constrained and that the endografts were helically conformable in the angular direction. The decrease of helical radius indicated a straightening of the corkscrew shape of the true lumen, and in combination with more circular and expanded lumen cross-sections, TEVAR produced luminal morphology that theoretically allows for lower flow resistance through the endografted portion. The impact of TEVAR on dissection flow lumen morphology and the interaction between endografts and aortic tissue can provide insight for improving device design, implantation technique, and long-term clinical outcomes.
AB - Objective: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can change the morphology of the flow lumen in aortic dissections, which may affect aortic hemodynamics and function. This study characterizes how the helical morphology of the true lumen in type B aortic dissections is altered by TEVAR. Methods: Patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent computed tomography angiography before and after TEVAR were retrospectively reviewed. Images were used to construct three-dimensional stereolithographic surface models of the true lumen and whole aorta using custom software. Stereolithographic models were segmented and co-registered to determine helical morphology of the true lumen with respect to the whole aorta. The true lumen region covered by the endograft was defined based on fiducial markers before and after TEVAR. The helical angle, average helical twist, peak helical twist, and cross-sectional eccentricity, area, and circumference were quantified in this region for pre- and post-TEVAR geometries. Results: Sixteen patients (61.3 ± 8.0 years; 12.5% female) were treated successfully for type B dissection (5 acute and 11 chronic) with TEVAR and scans before and after TEVAR were retrospectively obtained (follow-up interval 52 ± 91 days). From before to after TEVAR, the true lumen helical angle (–70.0 ± 71.1 to –64.9 ± 75.4°; P =.782), average helical twist (–4.1 ± 4.0 to –3.7 ± 3.8°/cm; P =.674), and peak helical twist (–13.2 ± 15.2 to –15.4 ± 14.2°/cm; P =.629) did not change. However, the true lumen helical radius (1.4 ± 0.5 to 1.0 ± 0.6 cm; P <.05) and eccentricity (0.9 ± 0.1 to 0.7 ± 0.1; P <.05) decreased, and the cross-sectional area (3.0 ± 1.1 to 5.0 ± 2.0 cm2; P <.05) and circumference (7.1 ± 1.0 to 8.0 ± 1.4 cm; P <.05) increased significantly from before to after TEVAR. The distinct bimodal distribution of chiral and achiral native dissections disappeared after TEVAR, and subgroup analyses showed that the true lumen circumference of acute dissections increased with TEVAR, although it did not for chronic dissections. Conclusions: The unchanged helical angle and average and peak helical twists as a result of TEVAR suggest that the angular positions of the true lumen are constrained and that the endografts were helically conformable in the angular direction. The decrease of helical radius indicated a straightening of the corkscrew shape of the true lumen, and in combination with more circular and expanded lumen cross-sections, TEVAR produced luminal morphology that theoretically allows for lower flow resistance through the endografted portion. The impact of TEVAR on dissection flow lumen morphology and the interaction between endografts and aortic tissue can provide insight for improving device design, implantation technique, and long-term clinical outcomes.
KW - Circumference
KW - Cross-sectional area
KW - Cross-sectional eccentricity
KW - Helical angle
KW - Helical radius
KW - Helical twist
KW - TEVAR
KW - Thoracic aorta
KW - True lumen
KW - Type B aortic dissection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106936432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106936432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 33940073
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 74
SP - 1499-1507.e1
JO - Journal of vascular surgery
JF - Journal of vascular surgery
IS - 5
ER -