TY - JOUR
T1 - Interactive editing of circuits in a step-based tutoring system
AU - Skromme, Brian J.
AU - Redshaw, Caleb
AU - Gupta, Abhishek
AU - Gupta, Shatrughn
AU - Andrei, Petru
AU - Erives, Hector
AU - DeAnna, Bailey
AU - Thompson, Willie L.
AU - Bansal, Srividya Kona
AU - Barnard, Wendy M.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through the Improving Undergraduate STEM Education and Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Programs under Grant Nos. 1821628, 1044497, and 1323773. We thank J. Aberle, G. Abousleman, M. Ardakani, J. Blain Christen, S. Chickamenahalli, S. Dahal, A. Ewaisha, R. Ferzli, G. Formicone, S. Goodnick, R. Gorur, O. Hartin, S. Jayasuriya, G. Karady, R. Kiehl, H. Mao, B. Matar, A. Maurer, D. Meldrum, B. Moraffah, C.-Z. Ning, S. Ozev, L. Sankar, A. Shafique, W. Shi, D. Shin, M. Tao, C. Tepedelenlioglu, T. Thornton, G. Trichopoulos, D. Vasileska, C. Wang, Y. Weng, M. Wong, Yu Yao, Hongbin Yu, and Hongyu Yu for using our software in their sections of EEE 202 at ASU. We thank W. Thompson II and Y. Astatke for using our software at Morgan State University, H. Underwood, R. Fish, and D. Pratt for using it at Messiah College, J. D. Irwin for using it at Auburn University, J. Ross and H. Xu for using it at University of the Pacific, V. Gupta for using it at the University of Notre Dame, A. Holmes for using it at the University of Virginia, G. Gilmore for using it at North Carolina A&T State University, O. Nare for using it at Hampton University, and T. Frank and B. Matar for using it at Glendale, South Mountain, and Chandler-Gilbert Community Colleges. We thank Don Fowley of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. for supporting the project. Funding Information: Wendy Barnard is an Assistant Research Professor and Director of the College Research and Evaluation Services Team (CREST) at Arizona State University. Dr. Barnard received her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she focused on the impact of early education experiences and parent involvement on long-term academic achievement. Her research interests include evaluation methodology, longitudinal research design, STEM educational efforts, and the impact of professional development on teacher performance. Currently, she works on evaluation efforts for grants funded by National Science Foundation, US Department of Education, local foundation, and state grants. Publisher Copyright: © American Society for Engineering Education 2020.
PY - 2020/6/22
Y1 - 2020/6/22
N2 - Step-based tutoring systems are known to be more effective than traditional answer-based systems. They however require that each step in a student's work be accepted and evaluated automatically to provide effective feedback. In the domain of linear circuit analysis, it is frequently necessary to allow students to draw or edit circuits on their screen to simplify or otherwise transform them. Here, the interface developed to accept such input and provide immediate feedback in the Circuit Tutor system is described, along with systematic assessment data. Advanced simplification methods such as removing circuit sections that are removably hinged, voltage-splittable, or current-splittable are taught to students in an interactive tutorial and then supported in the circuit editor itself. To address the learning curve associated with such an interface, ~70 video tutorials were created to demonstrate exactly how to work the randomly generated problems at each level of each of the tutorials in the system. A complete written record or 'transcript of student's work in the system is being made available, showing both incorrect and correct steps. Introductory interactive (multiple-choice) tutorials are now included on most topics. Assessment of exercises using the interactive editor was carried out by professional evaluators for several institutions, including three that heavily serve underrepresented minorities. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used, including focus groups, surveys, and interviews. Controlled, randomized, blind evaluations were carried out in three different course sections in Spring and Fall 2019 to evaluate three tutorials using the interactive editor, comparing use of Circuit Tutor to both a commercial answer-based system and to conventional textbook-based paper homework. In Fall 2019, students rated the software a mean of 4.14/5 for being helpful to learn the material vs. 3.05/5 for paper homework (HW), p < 0.001 and effect size d = 1.11σ. On relevant exam questions that semester, students scored significantly (p = 0.014) higher with an effect size of d = 0.64σ when using Circuit Tutor compared to paper HW in one class section, with no significant difference in the other section.
AB - Step-based tutoring systems are known to be more effective than traditional answer-based systems. They however require that each step in a student's work be accepted and evaluated automatically to provide effective feedback. In the domain of linear circuit analysis, it is frequently necessary to allow students to draw or edit circuits on their screen to simplify or otherwise transform them. Here, the interface developed to accept such input and provide immediate feedback in the Circuit Tutor system is described, along with systematic assessment data. Advanced simplification methods such as removing circuit sections that are removably hinged, voltage-splittable, or current-splittable are taught to students in an interactive tutorial and then supported in the circuit editor itself. To address the learning curve associated with such an interface, ~70 video tutorials were created to demonstrate exactly how to work the randomly generated problems at each level of each of the tutorials in the system. A complete written record or 'transcript of student's work in the system is being made available, showing both incorrect and correct steps. Introductory interactive (multiple-choice) tutorials are now included on most topics. Assessment of exercises using the interactive editor was carried out by professional evaluators for several institutions, including three that heavily serve underrepresented minorities. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used, including focus groups, surveys, and interviews. Controlled, randomized, blind evaluations were carried out in three different course sections in Spring and Fall 2019 to evaluate three tutorials using the interactive editor, comparing use of Circuit Tutor to both a commercial answer-based system and to conventional textbook-based paper homework. In Fall 2019, students rated the software a mean of 4.14/5 for being helpful to learn the material vs. 3.05/5 for paper homework (HW), p < 0.001 and effect size d = 1.11σ. On relevant exam questions that semester, students scored significantly (p = 0.014) higher with an effect size of d = 0.64σ when using Circuit Tutor compared to paper HW in one class section, with no significant difference in the other section.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095790256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095790256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
SN - 2153-5965
VL - 2020-June
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
M1 - 902
T2 - 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2020
Y2 - 22 June 2020 through 26 June 2020
ER -