TY - JOUR
T1 - Interrupting the coloniality of knowledge production in comparative education
T2 - Postsocialist and postcolonial dialogues after the cold war
AU - McGurty, Iveta
AU - Millei, Zsuzsa
AU - Piattoeva, Nelli
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to thank Inés Dussel, Jeremy Rappleye, and Will Brehm, as well as three anonymous reviewers and the editors of this special issue for their feedback on earlier drafts of this article. Nelli Piattoeva’s work on this project was supported by the Academy of Finland grant 273874. Publisher Copyright: © 2017 by the Comparative and International Education Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - The article explores the coloniality of knowledge production in comparative education in and about (post)socialist spaces of southeast/central Europe and the former Soviet Union after the Cold War. We engage in a particular form of decoloniality, or what Walter Mignolo terms “delinking,” to fracture the hegemony of Western-centric knowledge and enable comparative education to gain a global viewpoint that is more inclusive of different voices. Our critique is threefold. First, we engage in rethinking and rewriting socialist past(s) through new and multiple frames to reveal possibilities for imagining postsocialist future(s). Second, we show the relations and the intertwined histories of the spatially partitioned world. Third, we examine how coloniality has shaped our own identities as scholars and discuss ways to reclaim our positions as epistemic subjects who have both the legitimacy and capacity to look at and interpret the world from our own origins and lived realities.
AB - The article explores the coloniality of knowledge production in comparative education in and about (post)socialist spaces of southeast/central Europe and the former Soviet Union after the Cold War. We engage in a particular form of decoloniality, or what Walter Mignolo terms “delinking,” to fracture the hegemony of Western-centric knowledge and enable comparative education to gain a global viewpoint that is more inclusive of different voices. Our critique is threefold. First, we engage in rethinking and rewriting socialist past(s) through new and multiple frames to reveal possibilities for imagining postsocialist future(s). Second, we show the relations and the intertwined histories of the spatially partitioned world. Third, we examine how coloniality has shaped our own identities as scholars and discuss ways to reclaim our positions as epistemic subjects who have both the legitimacy and capacity to look at and interpret the world from our own origins and lived realities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031500350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031500350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/690458
DO - 10.1086/690458
M3 - Article
SN - 0010-4086
VL - 61
SP - S74-S102
JO - Comparative Education Review
JF - Comparative Education Review
ER -