TY - JOUR
T1 - L or G or B or T
T2 - Matching Sexual and Gender Minorities with Subpopulation-Specific Interventions
AU - Matsuno, Em
AU - Goodman, Joshua A.
AU - Israel, Tania
AU - Choi, Andrew Young
AU - Lin, Yen Jui
AU - Kary, Krishna G.
N1 - Funding Information: Data collection for this article was financially supported in part by the University of California, Santa Barbara Academic Senate Grant awarded to Tania Israel. Findings in this article were previously presented at the 123rd Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) may benefit from psychological interventions tailored to specific subpopulations (e.g., lesbians, gay men, bisexual people, transgender people) given differing experiences with stigma. However, determining the inclusion/exclusion process for subpopulation-specific interventions is challenging and recommendations for this process are scarce. We developed and evaluated a matching procedure to place 1183 SGM participants into four targeted online interventions designed to reduce internalized stigma for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. We evaluated participant attrition, efficacy, satisfaction with placement, and qualitative feedback across the four interventions. Results indicated that our matching procedure was time-efficient and largely successful in terms of low attrition, high satisfaction, and reaching segments of the SGM population not usually captured with the LGBT acronym. Based on these findings, we offer six practical guidelines for devising the inclusion/exclusion process or matching procedure for future subpopulation-specific SGM interventions studies.
AB - Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) may benefit from psychological interventions tailored to specific subpopulations (e.g., lesbians, gay men, bisexual people, transgender people) given differing experiences with stigma. However, determining the inclusion/exclusion process for subpopulation-specific interventions is challenging and recommendations for this process are scarce. We developed and evaluated a matching procedure to place 1183 SGM participants into four targeted online interventions designed to reduce internalized stigma for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. We evaluated participant attrition, efficacy, satisfaction with placement, and qualitative feedback across the four interventions. Results indicated that our matching procedure was time-efficient and largely successful in terms of low attrition, high satisfaction, and reaching segments of the SGM population not usually captured with the LGBT acronym. Based on these findings, we offer six practical guidelines for devising the inclusion/exclusion process or matching procedure for future subpopulation-specific SGM interventions studies.
KW - Classification
KW - LGBT
KW - gender identity
KW - intervention
KW - sexual orientation
KW - subpopulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092100521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092100521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1819714
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1819714
M3 - Article
SN - 0091-8369
VL - 69
SP - 385
EP - 407
JO - Journal of Homosexuality
JF - Journal of Homosexuality
IS - 3
ER -