Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leveraging comparative phylogenetics for evolutionary medicine: applications to comparative oncology

  • Walker J. Compton Mellon
  • , Beckett Sterner
  • , J. Arvid Ågren
  • , Orsolya Vincze
  • , Matthew Marx
  • , Stefania Kapsetaki
  • , Ping Han Huang
  • , Bryan Yavari
  • , Hunter W. McCollum
  • , B. Natterson-Horowitz
  • , Hannah Human
  • , Cristina Baciu
  • , Harley Richker
  • , Diego Mallo
  • , Carlo C. Maley
  • , Luke Harmon
  • , Zachary T. Compton

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Comparative phylogenetics provides a wealth of computational tools to understand evolutionary processes and their outcomes. Advances in these methodologies have occurred in parallel with a surge in cross-species genomic and phenotypic data. To date, however, the majority of published studies have focused on classical questions in evolutionary biology, such as speciation and the ecological drivers of trait evolution. Here, we argue that evolutionary medicine in general, and our understanding of the origin and diversification of disease traits in particular, would be greatly expanded by a wider integration of phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs). We use comparative oncology—the study of cancer across the tree of life—as an example to demonstrate the power of the approach and show that implementing PCMs can highlight the mode and tempo of the evolutionary changes in intrinsic, species-level disease vulnerabilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEvolution, Medicine and Public Health
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Keywords

  • bioinformatics
  • evolutionary biology
  • evolutionary medicine
  • phylogenetics
  • statistical modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leveraging comparative phylogenetics for evolutionary medicine: applications to comparative oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this