TY - JOUR
T1 - Leveraging SETS resilience capabilities for safe-to-fail infrastructure under climate change
AU - Kim, Yeowon
AU - Carvalhaes, Thomaz
AU - Helmrich, Alysha
AU - Markolf, Samuel
AU - Hoff, Ryan
AU - Chester, Mikhail
AU - Li, Rui
AU - Ahmad, Nasir
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - As the rehabilitation of infrastructure is outpaced by changes in the profile, frequency, and intensity of extreme weather events, infrastructure's service disruptions and failures become increasingly likely. Safe-to-fail approaches for infrastructure planning and design improve the capacity of cities to adapt for uncertain climate futures by identifying social, ecological, and technological systems (SETS) capabilities to prepare for potential failure scenarios. In this paper, we argue for transforming infrastructure planning and design to effectively utilize safe-to-fail approaches by navigating the opportunities and trade-offs of SETS resilience capabilities. From a technological vantage point, traditional infrastructure planning approaches account for social and ecological domains as external design conditions rather than embedded system characteristics. Safe-to-fail approaches directly challenge the isolation of the technological domain by necessitating a recognition that SETS domains are interconnected and interdependent in infrastructure systems, as such risks and system capabilities for resilience must be managed cohesively.
AB - As the rehabilitation of infrastructure is outpaced by changes in the profile, frequency, and intensity of extreme weather events, infrastructure's service disruptions and failures become increasingly likely. Safe-to-fail approaches for infrastructure planning and design improve the capacity of cities to adapt for uncertain climate futures by identifying social, ecological, and technological systems (SETS) capabilities to prepare for potential failure scenarios. In this paper, we argue for transforming infrastructure planning and design to effectively utilize safe-to-fail approaches by navigating the opportunities and trade-offs of SETS resilience capabilities. From a technological vantage point, traditional infrastructure planning approaches account for social and ecological domains as external design conditions rather than embedded system characteristics. Safe-to-fail approaches directly challenge the isolation of the technological domain by necessitating a recognition that SETS domains are interconnected and interdependent in infrastructure systems, as such risks and system capabilities for resilience must be managed cohesively.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124288825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124288825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101153
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101153
M3 - Review article
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 54
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
M1 - 101153
ER -