TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing
T2 - Towards a physics-informed data-driven paradigm
AU - Guo, Shenghan
AU - Agarwal, Mohit
AU - Cooper, Clayton
AU - Tian, Qi
AU - Gao, Robert X.
AU - Guo, Weihong Grace
AU - Guo, Y. B.
N1 - Funding Information: C. Cooper acknowledges support provided by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1937968 . R. Gao and Y. Guo acknowledge support provided by the National Science Foundation under award No. CMMI-2040288/2040358. The authors thank Mr. J. Zhang at Case Western Reserve University for his helpful input in revising this paper. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Society of Manufacturing Engineers
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Machine learning (ML) has shown to be an effective alternative to physical models for quality prediction and process optimization of metal additive manufacturing (AM). However, the inherent “black box” nature of ML techniques such as those represented by artificial neural networks has often presented a challenge to interpret ML outcomes in the framework of the complex thermodynamics that govern AM. While the practical benefits of ML provide an adequate justification, its utility as a reliable modeling tool is ultimately reliant on assured consistency with physical principles and model transparency. To facilitate the fundamental needs, physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has emerged as a hybrid machine learning paradigm that imbues ML models with physical domain knowledge such as thermomechanical laws and constraints. The distinguishing feature of PIML is the synergistic integration of data-driven methods that reflect system dynamics in real-time with the governing physics underlying AM. In this paper, the current state-of-the-art in metal AM is reviewed and opportunities for a paradigm shift to PIML are discussed, thereby identifying relevant future research directions.
AB - Machine learning (ML) has shown to be an effective alternative to physical models for quality prediction and process optimization of metal additive manufacturing (AM). However, the inherent “black box” nature of ML techniques such as those represented by artificial neural networks has often presented a challenge to interpret ML outcomes in the framework of the complex thermodynamics that govern AM. While the practical benefits of ML provide an adequate justification, its utility as a reliable modeling tool is ultimately reliant on assured consistency with physical principles and model transparency. To facilitate the fundamental needs, physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has emerged as a hybrid machine learning paradigm that imbues ML models with physical domain knowledge such as thermomechanical laws and constraints. The distinguishing feature of PIML is the synergistic integration of data-driven methods that reflect system dynamics in real-time with the governing physics underlying AM. In this paper, the current state-of-the-art in metal AM is reviewed and opportunities for a paradigm shift to PIML are discussed, thereby identifying relevant future research directions.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Deep learning
KW - Machine learning
KW - Physics of manufacturing processes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120355687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120355687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.003
M3 - Review article
SN - 0278-6125
VL - 62
SP - 145
EP - 163
JO - Journal of Manufacturing Systems
JF - Journal of Manufacturing Systems
ER -