Abstract
Research scientists have become increasingly dependent on collaborations across laboratories and organizations to maintain their productivity. However, the increased specialization of individual laboratories works against the current drive toward understanding systems in the sciences. Consequently, there is a tension between the rising importance of collaborative efforts and the practical and structural challenges in establishing and managing such collaborations. Combining ethnographic case studies of three biology research labs with network data of their larger scientific community, we explore the changing process of scientific knowledge production in the age of Big Science. We find that virtual technologies open up the knowledge process as scientists have easier access to data, publications, and each other. At the same time, we find that these technologies—specifically scientific databases—do not eradicate the social aspects of scientific knowledge production as collaborative structures in science remain relatively unchanged. We discuss the implications for theory and practice of this seemingly contradictory character of scientific knowledge production.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 531-547 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | American Behavioral Scientist |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 4 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- big science
- databases
- ethnography
- social network analysis
- virtual organization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies
- Education
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Making Science: New Generations of Collaborative Knowledge Production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS