TY - JOUR
T1 - Methods and challenges in the detection of microplastics and nanoplastics
T2 - a mini-review
AU - Adhikari, Sangeet
AU - Kelkar, Varun
AU - Kumar, Rahul
AU - Halden, Rolf U.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Industrial Chemistry.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) constitute a newly recognized class of contaminants of emerging concern in air, soil, water and food, causing unavoidable exposure to humans and animals. Detection, identification and quantification of MPs and NPs in environmental matrices and biota is challenging due to the analytes' small size, random morphology, polymeric diversity, applied coatings and vast surface areas which attract chemical and microbial sorbates. This mini-review explores strengths and weaknesses of analytical methods commonly used for MP and NP identification and quantification, including stereomicroscopy, SEM, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, flow cytometry and mass spectrometry techniques including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight, pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical challenges involved in precise MP/NP detection have been identified and recommendations have been provided to ensure data quality addressing common data quality concerns, including the difficulty of obtaining irrefutable proof that detected polymers originated from the sample as opposed to sample contamination during sample acquisition, sample processing and analysis.
AB - Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) constitute a newly recognized class of contaminants of emerging concern in air, soil, water and food, causing unavoidable exposure to humans and animals. Detection, identification and quantification of MPs and NPs in environmental matrices and biota is challenging due to the analytes' small size, random morphology, polymeric diversity, applied coatings and vast surface areas which attract chemical and microbial sorbates. This mini-review explores strengths and weaknesses of analytical methods commonly used for MP and NP identification and quantification, including stereomicroscopy, SEM, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, flow cytometry and mass spectrometry techniques including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight, pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical challenges involved in precise MP/NP detection have been identified and recommendations have been provided to ensure data quality addressing common data quality concerns, including the difficulty of obtaining irrefutable proof that detected polymers originated from the sample as opposed to sample contamination during sample acquisition, sample processing and analysis.
KW - environmental matrices
KW - history
KW - human tissue
KW - mass spectrometry
KW - plastic debris
KW - polymers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122961367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122961367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pi.6348
DO - 10.1002/pi.6348
M3 - Review article
SN - 0959-8103
VL - 71
SP - 543
EP - 551
JO - Polymer International
JF - Polymer International
IS - 5
ER -