TY - JOUR
T1 - Minding the Data-Gap Trap
T2 - Exploring Dynamics of Abundant Dolphin Populations Under Uncertainty
AU - Ashe, Erin
AU - Williams, Rob
AU - Clark, Christopher
AU - Erbe, Christine
AU - Gerber, Leah R.
AU - Hall, Ailsa J.
AU - Hammond, Philip S.
AU - Lacy, Robert C.
AU - Reeves, Randall
AU - Vollmer, Nicole L.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by Save Our Coast, Sitka Foundation, and McLean Foundation. Publisher Copyright: © Copyright © 2021 Ashe, Williams, Clark, Erbe, Gerber, Hall, Hammond, Lacy, Reeves and Vollmer.
PY - 2021/2/18
Y1 - 2021/2/18
N2 - Preventing declines in common species is key to sustaining the structure and function of marine ecosystems. Yet for many common marine mammals, including oceanic dolphins, statistical power to detect declines remains low due to patchy distribution and large variability in group sizes. In this study, population viability analyses (PVA) were used to model the dynamics of four oceanic dolphin populations off the United States West Coast: eastern North Pacific long-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis capensis), short-beaked common dolphins (D. delphis delphis), Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens), and “offshore” common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). We calibrated the PVA with life-history tables, studies on proxy species, and stock assessment reports. We explored the sensitivity of populations to demographic variation and projected how they may respond to changes in three sublethal threats (prey limitation, ocean noise, and chemical pollution) and one lethal threat (fisheries bycatch). We found the most serious projected declines in long-beaked common dolphins, which showed the lowest birth rate. Most threat scenarios resulted in declines that would not be detected by existing monitoring programs in the United States, which are among the most data-rich surveys of their kind. The cumulative effects of the three sublethal stressors exceeded the effect of the one lethal stressor (fisheries bycatch). To implement pro-active management and monitoring programs, anticipating which cetaceans are more at risk and which anthropogenic threats could cause declines is paramount. Our study highlights the value of model testing with PVA when monitoring data are poor, thereby identifying priorities for future research, monitoring, and management.
AB - Preventing declines in common species is key to sustaining the structure and function of marine ecosystems. Yet for many common marine mammals, including oceanic dolphins, statistical power to detect declines remains low due to patchy distribution and large variability in group sizes. In this study, population viability analyses (PVA) were used to model the dynamics of four oceanic dolphin populations off the United States West Coast: eastern North Pacific long-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis capensis), short-beaked common dolphins (D. delphis delphis), Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens), and “offshore” common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). We calibrated the PVA with life-history tables, studies on proxy species, and stock assessment reports. We explored the sensitivity of populations to demographic variation and projected how they may respond to changes in three sublethal threats (prey limitation, ocean noise, and chemical pollution) and one lethal threat (fisheries bycatch). We found the most serious projected declines in long-beaked common dolphins, which showed the lowest birth rate. Most threat scenarios resulted in declines that would not be detected by existing monitoring programs in the United States, which are among the most data-rich surveys of their kind. The cumulative effects of the three sublethal stressors exceeded the effect of the one lethal stressor (fisheries bycatch). To implement pro-active management and monitoring programs, anticipating which cetaceans are more at risk and which anthropogenic threats could cause declines is paramount. Our study highlights the value of model testing with PVA when monitoring data are poor, thereby identifying priorities for future research, monitoring, and management.
KW - anthropogenic threats
KW - cetacean
KW - data deficient
KW - endangered
KW - management
KW - population viability analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102105215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102105215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2021.606932
DO - 10.3389/fmars.2021.606932
M3 - Article
SN - 2296-7745
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Marine Science
JF - Frontiers in Marine Science
M1 - 606932
ER -