TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-method teacher evaluation for high poverty schools
T2 - Observations and self-ratings of instructional and behavioral management
AU - Kettler, Ryan J.
AU - Arnold-Berkovits, Ilona
AU - Reddy Rutgers, Linda A.
AU - Kurz, Alexander
AU - Dudek, Christopher M.
AU - Hua, Anh N.
AU - Lekwa, Adam
N1 - Funding Information: The current study was implemented as part of the School System Improvement (SSI) Project, a collaboration between multiple universities and charter schools funded by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Innovation and Improvement as part of the Teacher Incentive Fund program (awarded to Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, #S374A120060 ). The positions and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors. Publisher Copyright: © 2018
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - The investigation examined the degree to which data from a multi-method, multi-informant teacher evaluation project related to growth in student achievement as measured using the Measures of Academic Progress in high poverty charter schools. Investigators used two classroom observational measures (the Framework for Teaching and the Classroom Strategies Assessment System-Observer form) and two teacher self-report measures (the Instructional Learning Opportunities Guidance System and the Classroom Strategies Assessment System-Teacher form) in 15 high poverty charter schools to assess teacher performance as part of a school reform grant funded by the US Department of Education, Teacher Incentive Fund. Correlational analyses were conducted corresponding to each combination of method, content area, and criterion score type, as well as controlling for grade level. Bivariate correlations were modest and different than those found in previous research, and findings from multiple regression analyses favored different scores based on method and content area.
AB - The investigation examined the degree to which data from a multi-method, multi-informant teacher evaluation project related to growth in student achievement as measured using the Measures of Academic Progress in high poverty charter schools. Investigators used two classroom observational measures (the Framework for Teaching and the Classroom Strategies Assessment System-Observer form) and two teacher self-report measures (the Instructional Learning Opportunities Guidance System and the Classroom Strategies Assessment System-Teacher form) in 15 high poverty charter schools to assess teacher performance as part of a school reform grant funded by the US Department of Education, Teacher Incentive Fund. Correlational analyses were conducted corresponding to each combination of method, content area, and criterion score type, as well as controlling for grade level. Bivariate correlations were modest and different than those found in previous research, and findings from multiple regression analyses favored different scores based on method and content area.
KW - Observations
KW - Rating scales
KW - Student achievement
KW - Teacher evaluation
KW - Validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053424414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053424414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.08.004
M3 - Article
SN - 0191-491X
VL - 59
SP - 224
EP - 234
JO - Studies in Educational Evaluation
JF - Studies in Educational Evaluation
ER -