TY - JOUR
T1 - Networks of action situations
T2 - a systematic review of empirical research
AU - Kimmich, Christian
AU - Baldwin, Elizabeth
AU - Kellner, Elke
AU - Oberlack, Christoph
AU - Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
N1 - Funding Information: Inspiration through the i-CONN project on interdisciplinary connectivity science, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 859937, is gratefully acknowledged. Funding Information: Inspiration through the i-CONN project on interdisciplinary connectivity science, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 859937, is gratefully acknowledged. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - “Action situations”—events, venues, or physically interdependent instances of decision-making—have become a central unit of analysis in the social–environmental sciences, particularly among scholars interested in bridging the social with the biophysical or ecological side of interdependent decisions. A growing body of empirical studies in social–ecological systems research has recently used case and comparative studies to analyse multiple interdependent action situations, structured into networks. In this article, we take stock of this body of empirical research, synthesize the diverse approaches that scholars have taken to assess “networks of action situations”, and identify fruitful paths forward. We conduct a systematic review of the empirical literature in the field, reviewing and summarizing the key characteristics of the empirical studies, including network features, topologies, methods, and data sources used in each case. We summarize and discuss the conceptualizations, methods, diagnostic procedures, and conclusions used in this body of work in a narrative framework synthesis. The review indicates that an increasingly coherent approach is taking shape, but a systematic, protocol-driven, or formalized approach is only partly emerging. We derive future research needs that could help accumulate knowledge from empirical research.
AB - “Action situations”—events, venues, or physically interdependent instances of decision-making—have become a central unit of analysis in the social–environmental sciences, particularly among scholars interested in bridging the social with the biophysical or ecological side of interdependent decisions. A growing body of empirical studies in social–ecological systems research has recently used case and comparative studies to analyse multiple interdependent action situations, structured into networks. In this article, we take stock of this body of empirical research, synthesize the diverse approaches that scholars have taken to assess “networks of action situations”, and identify fruitful paths forward. We conduct a systematic review of the empirical literature in the field, reviewing and summarizing the key characteristics of the empirical studies, including network features, topologies, methods, and data sources used in each case. We summarize and discuss the conceptualizations, methods, diagnostic procedures, and conclusions used in this body of work in a narrative framework synthesis. The review indicates that an increasingly coherent approach is taking shape, but a systematic, protocol-driven, or formalized approach is only partly emerging. We derive future research needs that could help accumulate knowledge from empirical research.
KW - Action situation
KW - Ecology of games
KW - Environmental governance
KW - Institutional analysis
KW - Polycentricity
KW - Situation-centred networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126021903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126021903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11625-022-01121-2
DO - 10.1007/s11625-022-01121-2
M3 - Review article
SN - 1862-4065
VL - 18
SP - 11
EP - 26
JO - Sustainability Science
JF - Sustainability Science
IS - 1
ER -