Abstract
The contemporaneous relationship between temperature and income is important because it enables economists to estimate the economic impact of global warming without assuming a structural model. Until recently, empirical evidence generally suggests that there is a negative relationship between temperature and income, and, therefore, global warming has an adverse impact on economic activity. However, Nordhaus (2006) argues that the temperature-income relationship depends on how income is measured. We show in this paper that the results of Nordhaus (2006) may be due to an omitted-variable problem. Based on a well-motivated temperature-income model, we find that the relationship between temperature and income is not dependent on income measurement. Our regression results show that the adverse impact of an increase of 1. °C in temperature can be as much as a 3% decrease in total income for the G-7 nations. Therefore, our results suggest an aggressive climate mitigation policy.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 963-970 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Ecological Economics |
Volume | 70 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 15 2011 |
Keywords
- Global warming
- Income
- Quantile regression
- Temperature
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Environmental Science
- Economics and Econometrics