TY - JOUR
T1 - On modeling future workplace location decisions
T2 - An analysis of Texas employees
AU - Asmussen, Katherine E.
AU - Mondal, Aupal
AU - Bhat, Chandra R.
AU - Pendyala, Ram M.
N1 - Funding Information: This research was partially supported by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) under project number 0-7054: Integration of Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Methods in Regional Travel Survey Programs. The authors would like to thank Tom Schwerdt, Christeen Pusch, Geena Maskey, Ibrahima Tembely, Janie Temple, Sonya Solinsky, and Chad Coburn for useful comments throughout the project, and for assisting with survey development and dissemination. The authors are grateful to Lisa Macias and Sarah McGavick for help in survey instrument design, and Lisa Macias for additional help in formatting this document. Two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - In this paper, we examine work place location (WPL) preferences of workers in an unpredictable and evolving future by investigating how workers would prefer to allocate their monthly working days among the three WPL alternatives of working from home, from the work office, and from a variable third WPL. In contrast to earlier studies that typically focus on telework as a binary of whether an individual is a teleworker or not, we focus our attention on workers’ preferences for specific combinations of all three WPLs over a period of a month (including, but not limited to, only selecting one WPL for all days of the month). In our analysis, we employ the multiple discrete–continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model, using a 2022 stated preference survey of future work preferences of employees residing in the state of Texas. The results indicate that single young women with very young children, those with long commutes and “intolerable” traffic congestion to the work office, individuals with a private study in their homes, self-employed workers, and those in non-essential service occupations have the highest preference for working from home. On the other hand, older men, individuals from low income households, those residing in rural areas, and workers in essential service occupations have the highest preference for the work office. And, for the third WPL, young non-single women with very young children, individuals from low income households, part-time employees, and those in professional, managerial or finance occupations have the highest predisposition. These results should provide valuable insights to urban planners, homebuilders, employers, travel demand modelers, and a whole host of other businesses to achieve specific desired end states. From a data collection standpoint, our study underscores the need to collect detailed information about work patterns in future activity-travel surveys.
AB - In this paper, we examine work place location (WPL) preferences of workers in an unpredictable and evolving future by investigating how workers would prefer to allocate their monthly working days among the three WPL alternatives of working from home, from the work office, and from a variable third WPL. In contrast to earlier studies that typically focus on telework as a binary of whether an individual is a teleworker or not, we focus our attention on workers’ preferences for specific combinations of all three WPLs over a period of a month (including, but not limited to, only selecting one WPL for all days of the month). In our analysis, we employ the multiple discrete–continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model, using a 2022 stated preference survey of future work preferences of employees residing in the state of Texas. The results indicate that single young women with very young children, those with long commutes and “intolerable” traffic congestion to the work office, individuals with a private study in their homes, self-employed workers, and those in non-essential service occupations have the highest preference for working from home. On the other hand, older men, individuals from low income households, those residing in rural areas, and workers in essential service occupations have the highest preference for the work office. And, for the third WPL, young non-single women with very young children, individuals from low income households, part-time employees, and those in professional, managerial or finance occupations have the highest predisposition. These results should provide valuable insights to urban planners, homebuilders, employers, travel demand modelers, and a whole host of other businesses to achieve specific desired end states. From a data collection standpoint, our study underscores the need to collect detailed information about work patterns in future activity-travel surveys.
KW - Hybrid work
KW - Stated preference
KW - Teleworking
KW - Third work place
KW - Work environment
KW - Work place location
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153565636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85153565636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103671
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103671
M3 - Article
SN - 0965-8564
VL - 172
JO - Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
JF - Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
M1 - 103671
ER -