Opioid requirements in mechanically ventilated trauma patients receiving dexmedetomidine versus propofol

Ohoud A. Aljuhani, Courtney B. McKinney, Brian L. Erstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Proponents of dexmedetomidine often cite the agent's analgesic properties as one of its main advantages over propofol and benzodiazepines. However, there are very limited studies utilizing endpoints such as analgesic requirements to provide supporting evidence for these claims. The primary purpose of this retrospective study was to compare opioid analgesic requirements in trauma patients receiving nonconcurrent dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation while being weaned from mechanical ventilation. Total analgesic requirements were similar between dexmedetomidine and propofol within 48 hours of sedative initiation in adult trauma patients (P > .05).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-114
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Critical Care
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opioid requirements in mechanically ventilated trauma patients receiving dexmedetomidine versus propofol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this