Abstract
Using organizational justice as a guiding framework, the authors studied perceptions of affirmative action programs by presumed beneficiaries. Three conceptual issues were addressed: (a) the content of different affirmative action plans; (b) the 3-way interaction among distributive, procedural, and interactional justice; and (c) the distinction between outcome favorability and distributive justice. These ideas were tested with a sample of Black engineering students who responded to 1 of 6 plans. Participants distinguished among the various plans, with some policies being viewed as more fair than others. In addition, a 3-way interaction among the 3 types of organizational justice was observed. Specifically, the 2-way interaction between distributive and interactional fairness was only significant when procedural justice was low. Implications for organizational justice and for the design of affirmative action programs are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1168-1184 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Psychology |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2005 |
Keywords
- Affirmative action
- Diversity
- Organizational justice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology