TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic repair
AU - Iwakoshi, Shinichi
AU - Ogawa, Yukihisa
AU - Dake, Michael D.
AU - Ono, Yusuke
AU - Higashihara, Hiroki
AU - Ikoma, Akira
AU - Nakai, Motoki
AU - Taniguchi, Takanori
AU - Ogi, Takahiro
AU - Kawada, Hiroshi
AU - Tamura, Akio
AU - Ieko, Yoshirou
AU - Tanaka, Ryoichi
AU - Sohgawa, Etsuji
AU - Nagatomi, Satoru
AU - Woodhams, Reiko
AU - Ikeda, Osamu
AU - Mori, Kensaku
AU - Nishimaki, Hiroshi
AU - Koizumi, Jun
AU - Senokuchi, Terutoshi
AU - Hagihara, Makiyo
AU - Shimohira, Masashi
AU - Takasugi, Shohei
AU - Imaizumi, Akira
AU - Higashiura, Wataru
AU - Sakaguchi, Shoji
AU - Ichihashi, Shigeo
AU - Inoue, Takeshi
AU - Inoue, Takashi
AU - Kichikawa, Kimihiko
N1 - Funding Information: Author conflict of interest: M.D.D. reports grants and personal fees from Cook Medical, grants and personal fees from W. L. Gore & Associates, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the mid-term outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and clarify the risk factors for aneurysm enlargement after embolization procedures. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter registry study enrolling patients who underwent embolization procedures for type II endoleaks after EVAR from January 2012 to December 2018 at 19 Japanese centers. The primary end point was the rate of freedom from aneurysm enlargement, more than 5 mm in the aortic maximum diameter, after an embolization procedure. Demographic, procedural, follow-up, and laboratory data were collected. Continuous variables were summarized descriptively, and Kaplan-Meier analyses and a Cox regression model were used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of 315 patients (248 men and 67 women) were enrolled. The average duration from the initial embolization procedure to the last follow-up was 31.6 ± 24.6 months. The rates of freedom from aneurysm enlargement at 3 and 5 years were 55.4 ± 3.8% and 37.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that a larger aortic diameter at the initial embolization procedure and the presence of a Moyamoya endoleak, defined as heterogeneous contrast opacity with an indistinct faint border, were associated with aneurysm enlargement after embolization management. Conclusions: The embolization procedures were generally ineffective in preventing further expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with type II endoleaks after EVAR, especially in patients with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm and/or a presence of a Moyamoya endoleak.
AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the mid-term outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and clarify the risk factors for aneurysm enlargement after embolization procedures. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter registry study enrolling patients who underwent embolization procedures for type II endoleaks after EVAR from January 2012 to December 2018 at 19 Japanese centers. The primary end point was the rate of freedom from aneurysm enlargement, more than 5 mm in the aortic maximum diameter, after an embolization procedure. Demographic, procedural, follow-up, and laboratory data were collected. Continuous variables were summarized descriptively, and Kaplan-Meier analyses and a Cox regression model were used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of 315 patients (248 men and 67 women) were enrolled. The average duration from the initial embolization procedure to the last follow-up was 31.6 ± 24.6 months. The rates of freedom from aneurysm enlargement at 3 and 5 years were 55.4 ± 3.8% and 37.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that a larger aortic diameter at the initial embolization procedure and the presence of a Moyamoya endoleak, defined as heterogeneous contrast opacity with an indistinct faint border, were associated with aneurysm enlargement after embolization management. Conclusions: The embolization procedures were generally ineffective in preventing further expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with type II endoleaks after EVAR, especially in patients with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm and/or a presence of a Moyamoya endoleak.
KW - EVAR
KW - Embolization
KW - Endoleak
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138769106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138769106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.168
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.168
M3 - Article
C2 - 35985566
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 77
SP - 114-121.e2
JO - Journal of vascular surgery
JF - Journal of vascular surgery
IS - 1
ER -