@article{99f06c25f1314676b08d53b0476f9e33,
title = "Outcomes of endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with the GORE thoracic branch endoprosthesis for left subclavian artery preservation",
abstract = "Objective: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has emerged as the dominant paradigm for treatment of patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. For aneurysms involving the aortic arch in the region of the left subclavian artery (LSA), branch vessel preservation to maintain blood flow to the LSA is recommended. Branched aortic endografts are an alternative to surgical revascularization of the LSA. Methods: Across 34 investigative sites, 84 patients with zone 2 aneurysms were enrolled in a nonrandomized, prospective study of a single branched aortic endograft. The thoracic branch endoprosthesis device allows for graft placement proximal to the LSA and incorporates a single side branch for left subclavian perfusion. Results: More than one-half of the patients were male (63%). Their average age was 70 ± 11 years. The aneurysm morphology was fusiform in 43 and saccular in 41 patients. The mean aneurysm diameter at screening was 56.2 mm. The mean follow-up was 30 months (range, 2.6-50.7 months). Reported here are the patient outcomes at 1 and 12 months. Predefined technical success with implantation of the device in landing zone 2 was achieved in 92% of patients (n = 77). There were no cases of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, or new-onset renal failure. There was no perioperative (30-day) mortality. A single case each of permanent paraplegia and paraparesis occurred. Three patients experienced a procedure-related stroke. Through 12 months, four patients died; none of the deaths were adjudicated as related to the device or procedure. One aortic reintervention was required. A single case of aortic enlargement (core laboratory) was reported at 6 months. Type I (n = 3) and III (n = 5) endoleaks occurred in 9.8% of patients, of which one (type III) required reintervention. Conclusions: Results from this device study in patients with zone 2 aneurysms demonstrate that early safety and efficacy outcomes are maintained up to 12 months after the endovascular procedure with low mortality and reintervention rates and an acceptable frequency of procedural complications, including neurologic complications.",
keywords = "Branched aortic endoprosthesis, Left subclavian artery, TEVAR, Zone 2 aneurysm",
author = "Dake, {Michael D.} and Brinkman, {William T.} and Han, {Sukgu M.} and Matsumura, {Jon S.} and Sweet, {Matthew P.} and Patel, {Himanshu J.} and Taylor, {Bradley S.} and Oderich, {Gustavo S.}",
note = "Funding Information: Funded by W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc . W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. had involvement in the study design and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc paid for a professional writer to assist with writing the manuscript. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc was involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The medical writing support provided by Millie Hollandbeck (Phoenix, AZ) was funded by W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc . Funding Information: Additional conflicts of interest include: M.D. is a consultant for Cook Medical and Innovein; W.B. is a consultant for Medtronic Vascular, Terumo Aortic. and a Medtronic Cardiac Surgery North American advisory board member; S.H. is a consultant for Cook, Medical, Medtronic, and Terumo Aortic; J.M. received research support (funded to the University of Wisconsin) from Abbott , Cook , Endologix , and Medtronic ; M.S. serves on Medtronic and CryoLife advisory boards; B.T. is a consultant for Terumo Aortic; and G.O. is a consultant and receives research support from Medical and GE Healthcare, and is on the Cook Medical and Centerline Biomedical advisory boards. Funding Information: Funded by W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. had involvement in the study design and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc paid for a professional writer to assist with writing the manuscript. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc was involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The medical writing support provided by Millie Hollandbeck (Phoenix, AZ) was funded by W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.All authors, except M.S., declare a conflict of interests of serving as a consultant (W.B., S.H., H.P., B.T., G.O.) or on an advisory board (M.D.), receipt of research support (S.H., J.M., G.O.) from W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc; H.P. is a copatent holder and S.H. serves on the oversight medical board but honoraria is paid to his declared institution.Additional conflicts of interest include: M.D. is a consultant for Cook Medical and Innovein; W.B. is a consultant for Medtronic Vascular, Terumo Aortic. and a Medtronic Cardiac Surgery North American advisory board member; S.H. is a consultant for Cook, Medical, Medtronic, and Terumo Aortic; J.M. received research support (funded to the University of Wisconsin) from Abbott, Cook, Endologix, and Medtronic; M.S. serves on Medtronic and CryoLife advisory boards; B.T. is a consultant for Terumo Aortic; and G.O. is a consultant and receives research support from Medical and GE Healthcare, and is on the Cook Medical and Centerline Biomedical advisory boards. The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a conflict of interest. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1141--1149.e3",
journal = "Journal of vascular surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",
}